☰

Chotiryonuclear smartphones are unimaginable. Chotiyaderni smartphones

For the past 10 years, 4 cores have been the boundary of dreams for rich personal computers. Today, this is the minimum for a modern smartphone. Eminent companies have begun to install processors with 6, 8, or even 10 cores in their products. Prote widest the most 4 cores. Survival of these chips over 2-core masses: high productivity, efficient development of processes, work from modern software security. Until then, the number of chips is low, which plays into the hands of budget models. Now let's look at the rating of the best hottest smartphones in 2016.

Slim, inexpensive, ale Garni smartphone newcomer to the market mobile outbuildings. The call model is very suggestive of the iPhone 6. Without compromising the choice of materials, we prepared the body from aluminum. The front side is covered with a slope of 2.5D. A smartphone with a large screen, poor color reproduction and a good supply of brightness. There are no claims to productivity. It is based on a 4-core MediaTek MT6735P processor. Processing the chip at a clock frequency of 1 GHz. The processor, obviously, is not the most recent, but there are no problems with the speed of running on smartphones.

  • Android 6.0;
  • Aluminum case;
  • 13 MP - main camera;
  • 8 MP - dodatkova;
  • Graphics: Mali-T720;
  • 2 GB RAM;
  • 16 GB PZP;
  • Battery: 2500 mAh;

Pros:

  • Yakіsne folding;
  • Bad cameras;
  • Garna "filling";
  • Annual productivity;

Cons:

  • Not the best one let me know;
  • Not the best battery;

Smartphone w great battery that indestructible functionality. There are no serious considerations in front of the front to the design. A wicked smartphone made of plastic, the front side is curved. The lid is made of matte slimy plastic. A tight smartphone already with its looks gives you an understanding of how to fit into the budget class. The filling of the Honor 4C Pro is also cheap. The 4-core chip MediaTek MT6735, which is installed, as a rule, in budget smartphones, became the brain. The skin core operates at a clock frequency of 15 GHz. Unsurprisingly, the Honor 4C Pro is even more spritzy; nemaє podvisan that galm, launch new games. In AnTuTu, a mobile phone scored 13,000 points. The browser of the smartphone is not zamislyuvavsya, which one you choose Android, having installed version 5.1 of the firmware EMUI 3.1.

  • plastic case;
  • IPS-matrix, 5 inches, HD-detailed building;
  • 13 MP - main camera;
  • 8 MP - dodatkova;
  • Graphics: Mali-T720;
  • 2 GB RAM;
  • 16 GB PZP;
  • Rechargeable battery: 4000 mAh;

Pros:

  • Bad display;
  • Guide cameras;
  • Harne "Zalizo";
  • Єmna battery;

Cons:

  • Housing made of plastic, which sometimes starts to creak;

The best smartphone with this kind of battery, which was made by companies from China and Russia. The stench blew five steps of other companies, which gave budgetary solutions with metal cases. Highscreen Tasty chimes from the metal, looks unfamiliar, there are no twisted inserts that confuse the body. Tom smart phone looking badly not only in the hands of a bastard, but in a grown-up person. Quiet good-quality materials are prepared, the stench does not only look expensive, but they look the same. Do not get overwhelmed with vodbitkiv, nі podryapin. For all the characteristics of a smartphone, it is also necessary to bring its belonging to a lower class for some kind of blame. The original 4-core chip MediaTek MT6735 is installed, which supports 4G. To finish the garni with a veil of wine, wanting to ideal, it’s obviously far away. Quiet 3 GB of RAM, which is currently rare for smartphones at an affordable price.


  • Android 5.1;
  • metal case;
  • IPS-matrix, 5 inches, HD-detailed building;
  • 8 MP - main camera;
  • 5 MP - dodatkova;
  • Graphics: Mali-T720;
  • 3 GB RAM;
  • 16 GB PZP;
  • Battery: 2400 mAh;

Pros:

  • Good body;
  • Bad display;
  • Guide "filling";

Cons:

  • Chi is not better cameras;
  • Low autonomy;

The best smartphone on the market today Chinese company yaka nav'yazuє seryoznu bortbu Іnshim budget models Nasampered, hush varіst modelі (three more than 6000 rubles), scho zumovlyuє such popularity. Regardless of the plastic parts, the smartphone deservedly won the TOP. The choice of wine is clear, but it doesn’t look cheap. Trochy may be the same edging to the screen. Smartphone with two SIM-cards and support for 4G, which is the same without any transmission. The "heart" is not the best 4-core chip MediaTek MT6737, which works with a clock frequency of 1.1 GHz. However, at the same time, out of 2 GB of RAM, it shows itself badly, launching the rest of the game releases. Do a good job and with the autonomy of the smartphone, start the "top" battery.

  • Android 6.0;
  • plastic case;
  • IPS-matrix, 5.5 inches, HD-detailed building;
  • 13 MP - main camera;
  • 5 MP - dodatkova;
  • Graphics: Mali-T720 MP2;
  • 2 GB RAM;
  • 16 GB PZP;
  • Rechargeable battery: 3000 mAh;

Pros:

  • Good folding;
  • Yakіst znіmkіv;
  • Bad "stuffing";
  • Garna autonomy;

Cons:

  • Dark screen;

A novelty with a great sound from a popular company from China, which didn’t get a troch to get up in the first place in the rating of the best chotiryaderny smartphones. Honor 5A is a typical state employee, good choice, we hope you get all the necessary functionality. Viconanius the best budget smartphone according to the company's standard form factor: equal outlines, smooth transitions, rounded edges. The rear cover is lifted, crushed from matte plastic, which is invisible to me in part, the beats melt. Irrespective of plastic, the smartphone case does not creak, does not crunch, the cover is not pressed, that device looks even worse. The device is not equipped with the most productive MediaTek MT6735P processor of today. Everything is standard here: 4 cores, clock frequency - 1 GHz. The speed of a smartphone’s robots can reach the temple, the galma can be remembered less in some powerful games, and then on the maximum graphics settings.

  • Android 5.1;
  • plastic case;
  • IPS-matrix, 5 inches, HD-detailed building;
  • 13 MP - main camera;
  • 5 MP - dodatkova;
  • Graphics: Mali-T720;
  • 2 GB RAM;
  • 16 GB PZP;
  • Battery: 2200 mAh;

Pros:

  • Storage on high;
  • Sokovity, Yaskraviy display;
  • Garn productivity;

Cons:

  • Low battery capacity;

The first place in the TOP of “chotiryokhyadernikov” was given to a not found smartphone of a Korean company. The company, like a lot of others, no less produces flagships, but it also supports the budget niche. Obviously, the undisputed leader of this smartphone did not win through its dependent varity. A viconian smartphone made of black plastic, which is not surprising. The call is similar to other Samsung models. From the metal only edging around the front side. The best smartphone in the rating looks elegant and prestigious, about what to say and the number of reviews of Vlasniks on the forums. "Stuffing" is not the best, but productive for many competitors. The basis is to use the Swedish 4-core Snapdragon 410, which works at a clock frequency of 1.2 GHz. The best smartphone, which you can buy in 2016 for 16,000 rubles, demonstrates the bad code for optimization, but there are no miracles in the check.


  • Android 5.1;
  • plastic case;
  • IPS-matrix, 5.2 inches, HD-dozvіl, AMOLED;
  • 13 MP - main camera;
  • 5 MP - dodatkova;
  • 2 GB RAM;
  • 16 GB PZP;
  • Rechargeable battery: 3100 mAh;

Pros:

  • Yakіsne folding;
  • Yaskraviy, juice display;
  • Wonder chambers;
  • Guided autonomy;

Singingly, for the richness of our spivtchizniks among the midst of coristuvachs, they sounded like they were sticking themselves out, the phrase "budget smart phone" sounds like today, softly, apparently, silently.

Tim is not smaller, reality, which is constantly changing daylight portable electronics such that in our stores you can easily get equipment with a 4-core processor Mediatek MT6589 fully functional device that is called "for inexpensive".

It was clear, all the zavdyaks to the Chinese brewers, as if innocently practiced and worked on the release of new outbuildings, as if they were inspired to nazdoganyayut, and in such vipadaks to go over the bread and butter of rich house brands, with which not only for the price, but for the price.

As for the prospects of Android smartphones on the MTK6589, then it’s not enough to rely on mysterious analysts, because the whole world has already become a sign of the success of the dual-core chipset MTK6577 markets of the largest countries. And, obviously, companies from the Middle Kingdom do not dare to reach what they have reached, more so, that new inexpensive smartphones on the 4-core MTK6589 will go near a wide mass, we will already blaze the MTK6577 path and know your purchase is much better. The first retail sellers who have caught the taste of supplies in the sale of budget smartphones on the Dual Core MTK6577, for any doubt, will accept the transfer of devices on the MTK6589.

Speaking of which, judging by the reviews on various specialized forums, Chinese smartphones based on 4-core MTK6589 delight potential consumers with an extremely low ratio compared to analogues of top light brands at a price and high productivity, but also decent functionality. More than that, the functions are still very rare to build for four-nuclear models of conducting light sources, as you can match for their characteristics.

On tsomu with lyrics, maybe, we’ll finish. I gave them a pіdut butt. Let's say it again: the technical specifications of the models, which we included in our small TOP5, are very similar, because all the smartphones pointed below are equipped with MT6589 processors and are processed under Android OS V4.1 (Jelly Bean) or slightly modified versions. Usі p'yat devices dvosіmochnі. In this order, the models are considered daily for the price, the amount of operational memory, the dimensions and the size of the displays, the possibility of using cameras and a set of front-installed software. Vіdminnostі, like Bachimo. not a lot, but a lot.

Father, marvel TOP5 best budget Android smartphones with MT6589 Quad core in 2013 version. Pochnemo, as usual, not on the cob:

No. 5. Xolo Q800

Xolo Q800 - the brainchild of the Chinese company Lava Mobile - officially launched on the cob, but in our stores this smartphone is seriously not yet lit up, wanting a lot of sellers to take yoga to the appointment. The device is equipped with a 1.2 GHz 4-core processor with MT6589 chipset, PowerVR SGX544 GPU graphics and 1GB of RAM. Plus up to 4.5-inch IPS-display with 540 x 960 pixels and multi-touch support (the ability to recognize up to 5 dots at once). The Xolo Q800 ships with Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) pre-installed, but it's possible to upgrade to Android OS V4.2 without saying anything yet. Also, the Q800 has a main 8-megapixel camera (for the time being, we do not recommend scoring the same grandiose records in smartphones like Samsung or Nokia) and a front camera of 1Mpix, which is just right. The battery of the Q800 has a capacity of 2100 mAh, which, without wondering at the carelessness of the display and the processor, allows you to fully protect the decent autonomy of your smartphone.

You can borrow the Xolo Q800 for a price of approx. $400 . Rozmіri attach 135.5 x 67 x 9.6 mm, vaga - 143 g.

4. Zopo Libero HD


Needless to say, Zopo Libero HD smartphones (also known as ZOPO ZP810) are developed by Zopo Mobile - one of the most popular in China and in neighboring Asia. It is not important to remember that this model is more likely to guess Chinese smartphone- Micromax Canvas HD A116, but if someone has copied something, it's important to say that shards of insults were added to the market at once. Just like Micromax's cousin, the Zopo Libero HD is equipped with a 4-core 1.2 GHz MTK6577 processor and 1GB of RAM. The 5-inch IPS screen of the Libero HD model can be expanded to 720 x 1280 and covered with Gorilla Glass. About the size of pixels per inch, we can’t say anything yet, but we’ll dare to admit that the screen of your smartphone can also be the same as that of the A116, then. the number of pixels in a new one is 294 ppi. Zopo Libero HD ships with Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean (nothing is known about the future of the update). There are two cameras of the smartphone: the main one is 8 Mpix and the front one is 2 Mpix. The standard battery capacity of 2000 mAh, according to the manufacturer, allows the Zopo Libero HD to go without recharging for about one day for an average charge.

Varto Zopo Libero HD $270 . Rozmіri attach 141.9 x 73.6 x 10.2 mm, vaga - 180 g.

3. Micromax Canvas HD A116


Micromax Canvas smartphones became popular even before the appearance of the HD A116 model, however, the launch of the 116th series brought new chanels in the rich countries of the world. HD A116 splits on the basis of the front model - A110, but, without being surprised at the price, radically argues for its characteristics and functionality compared to the earlier Canvas. At the same time, in short bik. Wide public Micromax Canvas HD A116 officially introduced to the world of in-line rock, ale yogo way to the distribution of the old and important through the problems with the components, which winkli between the foreman and the companies-postal workers. Canvas HD A116 with a 1.2GHz Quad-Core Mediatek MT6589 processor and 1GB RAM, as well as. As we have already said, a 5-inch IPS display with a 720 x 1280 pixel resolution at a resolution of 294 ppi. Ale, on the view of Zopo Mobile in Micromax, maybe, on the screen, there were trochs less visible, so the Gorilla Glass HD A116 is more modest, so that the power of the coristuvachiv from that sound is sing-song.

Natom_st vіdomo, scho the nearest future Vlasnik Canvas HD A116 can upgrade the standard OS Android OS V4.1.2 (Jelly Bean) to version V4.2, about which the virobnik has already been announced. The device is equipped with two cameras - 8-megapixel and 2-megapixel, about how to write about how to capture the stink of the cameras of HighEnd-models Samsung, Nokia and other other types. Rechargeable battery HD A116, capacity 2000 mAh, tobto. about a day offline or 174 years in smart mode. Rosemary 141.9 х 73.6 х 10.2 mm, wagon 156

You can buy Micromax Canvas HD A116 for about $300 , What is a little more expensive, lower price "Zibrata" from Zopo. Prote є important nuance: Micromax is actively developing a network of specialized service centers around the world. And it is possible that Canvas will be sold officially with us, then with their repair and maintenance at the koristuvachіv power, the blame is less. Well, I know that it’s possible to take more technology in the future, you’re less likely to get such a smartphone in the present, then the alternative is the axis of the won – Zopo Libero HD, well, but for those pennies, then the trochs are less expensive ZOPO C2.

2.UMI X2


Umi X2 Quadcore from the Chinese company Umi is insanely the toughest smartphone on our list. Cream of the randomly designed MT6589 Quad Core 1.2GHz, this model is also equipped with 2GB of RAM - once. Plus #2: The X2 also features a 5-inch HD IPS Retina display with a 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution and 441 pixels per inch resolution, which is why it's unique in this class. Plus number 3: the virobnik did not stint on garniy zakhist - the Umi X2 Quadcore display protects from mechanical flaws covered by Gorilla Glass 2.

Umi X2 Quadcore "in the base" is supplied with Jelly Bean, but even with a stock smartphone, you can upgrade the OS to version 4.2. But still not all. Umi X2 can have the best main camera in its class, which has as much as 13 Mpix (plus a 2-megapixel front camera for Skype only) and a battery with a capacity of 2500 mAh, which, on the other hand, is not so rich for a smartphone with such a screen.

The current price of Umi X2 Quadcore is close to the domestic retailer $370 - expensive, but pleasant, as for a mobile attachment with such characteristics. Tim more, since in the near abroad the variability of the price model has already begun to gradually decrease, it can be influenced by the similar price dynamics in us. Rozmiri I will add 135 x 68 x 8.9 mm, waga - 155 g.

1.Jiayu G4


… rightly placed first in our mini-rating, the specs of the same device, in our opinion, optimally match this vartost. Jiayu G4 is similar to Umi X2 in terms of specifications: it is also equipped with a MT6589 Quad Core 1.2GHz processor, PowerVR SGX 544 graphics, 2GB of RAM, as well as a 4.7-inch Retina display with a separate 1280 x 720 2 Protection, plus similar 13 Mpix and 2 Mpix cameras. And the installed Android OS V4.1 can be upgraded to Android OS V4.2.

ALE є reception nuance: Jiayu G4 has more transfers large battery at 3000 mAh, which ensures the device more doby autonomous robots in normal, but not in economy mode. I will add a larger battery (an even thinner 1800 mAh battery) - 133 x 65 x 10 mm, 180 g.

And recently, the Ejiayu company voiced on its Facebook side about us suttively lowering the recommended retail price for the Jiayu G4 model, which by itself can not help but be quiet. In other words, today's democratically $300, as our sellers ask for G4 and for a ton price on 4-core smartphones look more lower (looking at the characteristics of the model), they can change, for example, on $250 (like in the lands of Europe).

And so pennies for a fully functional device with Quad Core, 2GB RAM, IPS-panel, 13-megapixel camera and OS v4.1 from the start - It’s not just a hit on the market, it’s just a revolution in the segment of Android smartphones in any region of the world, it’s just the beginning of a global revolution!

In this article, we can imagine a list of the shortest inexpensive smartphones with 4 GB of RAM and are equal to expensive smartphones from the top segment with the same characteristics.

The best budget smartphones for Android 2016 with 4 GB of RAM

If you marvel at the prices of smartphones from 4 GB of RAM, first, what are you thinking about, high price And you can’t afford such a luxury, but you want your mother’s garniy apparatus for grilling, photo of that. And in 2016, the most popular smartphones in the middle price segment “learned” how to satisfy the needs of the average statistical purchase. Now it is not necessary to spend pennies on expensive brandy Samsung, Sony, HTC.

We prepared list of the shortest budget smartphones on android 2016 with 4 GB of RAM and yakі can be bought in Russia.

Xiaomi Mi 5

Xiaomi Mi 5 was launched at the fierce MWC 2016 rock. This brand’s fans were selected for the yoga release in March 2015, and the company decided to present yoga at MWC 2016. Mi 5 is the most powerful smartphone in all parameters, which can boast of specifications similar to high-end smartphones.

Attachments are delivered in 3 versions: standard 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of built-in memory; high 3GB of RAM and 64 RAM; Exclusive 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of flash memory. Speaking of price, Xiaomi Mi 5 costs $413 for the 4GB RAM version, packed with the latest Snapdragon 820 chipset.

Main specifications of Mi 5

  • 16 MP camera with autofocus;
  • 5.15 inch touch sensitive IPS screen with 1080 x 1920 pixels and 16M colors;
  • OS Android 6.0 Marshmallow;
  • Processor Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820;
  • Unknown lipo-polymer battery with a capacity of 3000 mAh

One Plus 2


OnePlus 2 can be called the successor of OnePlus 1. OnePlus is respected as a product maker in the mid-price segment. OnePlus 2 is another one of the best budget Android smartphones with 4 GB of RAM. Attachment is close to 25,000 rubles and is supplied with a Snapdragon 810 processor, which sounds like it will be installed in a large top-class annex, which is more expensive, lower OnePlus 2.

Main specifications of OnePlus 2

  • Octa-core Snapdragon processor 810;
  • 4 GB of RAM;
  • 5.5" Full HD display with Gorilla Glass;
  • 13 MP body camera with a light-colored sleeping bag;
  • 5 MP front camera;
  • Lithium-polymer battery 3300mAh

YU Yutopia


YU Yutopia is the first budget smartphone from YU Televentures. The company confirms that it is the hottest smartphone for today. Youtopia can use programs to promote such a service, like booking hotels, flights and paying flights (service available in Europe). Attachment for 26,000 rubles is equipped with 4 GB of RAM, 21-megapixel main camera Qualcomm Snapdragon 810, which in our list of the best low-cost Android smartphones 2016 with 4 GB of RAM, we put it in third place.

Specifications YU Yutopia

  • Octa-core processor Snapdragon 810 with a frequency of 2 GHz;
  • 5.2 inch display at 1440 × 2560 pixels;
  • 21 MP camera with underwire light sleeper;
  • 8MP front camera;
  • 3000 mAh lithium-ion battery;
  • 32GB flash memory

Asus Zenfone 2


Asus Zenfone 2 is one of the most popular budget devices with 4 GB of RAM. Asus promotes 3 options for this line.

Attached equipment 4 GB of RAM, and a core processor with a frequency of 2.3 GHz, which is enough to get into the most buggy graphic games. Attached may garny design and comes with a 13 MP body camera with a light sleeper. The 5-megapixel front camera with a wide-angle lens is perfectly suitable for selfies and video calls.

Key Specs Asus Zenfone 2

  • Eight-core processor Atom іz with a frequency of 2.3 GHz;
  • 5.5-inch Full HD display;
  • 13 MP body camera with underwire light cover;
  • 32 GB flash memory;
  • Support for two SIMs;
  • The robot has 4G, 3G networks;
  • 4 GB of RAM;
  • Battery 3,000mAh.

LeTV (LeEco) Le Max 64GB


LeEco Le Max is another one of the hardest phones, announcements in India in the spring of 2016. Add cost close to 500 dollars. As well as other additions to the list, Le Max also comes with hard processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 810. Attached may 21MP camera, as in the test showed good results. Le Max is a dual smartphone that promotes 4G connectivity. Vіn may 6.33-inch display with amazing graphics for watching movies, but on the other side, not very ergonomic.

Le max will be true to its price, the chips can be made practically whether it is important graphic intensive games.

Key specifications Le Max

  • 4 GB of RAM;
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 octa-core processor;
  • 21 MP main camera;
  • OS Android 5.0 Lollipop with EUI shell;
  • 4 MP front camera;
  • Dual Standby (sustainable mode) with mobile 4G Sim (LTE + LTE);
  • 6.33 inch display;
  • Internal memory - 64 GB;
  • Fingerprint scanner;
  • Google translation for business

(Visited 19 300 times, 1 visits today)

Fasten your belts, friends, be fun! If smartphones are the most powerful in the world, their foreheads are colliding, the battlefield will be clear! On the arena of chotiri titans of the world of Android: samsung galaxy S III, HTC One X, Meizu MX 4-core and LG Optimus 4X HD. Cі "chotiri apocryphants of the apocalypse" swept on their way, be it someone who dares to compete with them.

We fought and protested all the smartphones, and navit zishtovhuvali them among themselves in the battle of the night-to-night. In this rank, mi nadamo comprehensive look. Great interest to which resistance is blamed is due to those that all smartphones are under Android certifi- cation . Only one of the contenders will get the super prize.

The Great Mіts – tse vіdpovidalnost is always great, and tsі smartphones present not only to themselves, but also to their pickers. The whole struggle of microprocessors. Samsung Galaxy S III and Meizu MX Quad Core have the same processor - Exynos 4212 Quad, as well as HTC One X and LG Optimus 4X HD are equipped with an Nvidia Tegra 3 processor, which is actually not a chotiri-, but a five-core (with additional power-saving upgrade) core) ). Otzhe, vreshti-resht go out, but it’s not only individual, but also group magic. Ale, you can win more than one. Otzhe, on scho mi zvetatimemo respect for the hour of this epic battle of chotiria nuclear superniks.

Mi pochnemo іz zagalnogo look around koristuvach interface smartphones, to determine the individuality of their skin. Ale, it’s just a little more easy to play before a series of tests and tests. We don't just understand, why are there two buildings different types microprocessors, but most importantly, the stench is effective in these models.

We will test processors, graphics and web browsers to bring out the best smartphone under Android for this season. Photos and videos of Full-HD can be taken to respect. Looking at the scale of the outbuildings from a look of complexity, next determine what the stench is equipped with good cameras. Therefore, we can also look at how our cameras work, and as a result, we will be able to overcome.

What else? Well, so. Characteristics of the screen and batteries will also be thrown into the bowl, to understand how the stench of the smart phones is broken. Calculating the tightness is important, but it gives a complete picture.

So let's do it. Chotiri smart phone and one meta - overtake that overturn all! We can't see the penny side here. We may be right with a couple of smartphones, and we choose to explore them in detail. Let's do our test!

Screen alignment

Irrespective of those who, in this article, emphasize the emphasis on equal smartphones with 4-core processors, the screen can still be respectful - even if it’s meanness in the face of all the counting pressures, as the screen is between your abilities.

Three smartphones have approximately identical screens (size 4.7"-4.8", size 720r), and only Meizu MX 4-core has a larger compact screen with a smaller size. We have taken the characteristics of all the screens in the table and try to clarify the situation.

In the table, the main parameters are indicated - expansion, building distribution, pixel width thin. - Plus "bezel". Bezel - this is our test to evaluate how much space the bezel occupies near the screen - the larger the bezel, the smaller the smartphone screen itself.

The difference between 4.7" and 4.8" is not so big - it will provide 4% more space and lead to a minimum reduction in the size of the pixels. All three smartphones with large screens can achieve 300+ ppi pixels (the screens are informally called Retina), and the Meizu MX 4-core axis is really the lowest for the whole rіven.

Retail in clarity, you can see only as much as to marvel at the screen even closer. If you trim a smartphone at a distance of 5-10 cm from an individual, you can probably note the “toothiness” of the image on the MX 4-core screen, but you don’t see it with an all-round twist.

The Samsung Galaxy S III has a Super AMOLED screen with a PenTile matrix, which is less than 2/3 pixels of the other two 720p screens. In this way, although technically at a new temple there are a lot of pixels, maybe there will be a little bit of "toothing" and shading of the image, but again, for goodness sake, you happen to marvel at the greater nearness of the country, but you marvel at the most comfortable in every way.

Meizu will program at a glance the screen format (height-to-width adjustment) 3:2, like the iPhone; vіn allows you to look over photo 4:3 and video 16:9 only for the help of adding a black field to the beast and below, so that it can rob and so small (visibly, splendidly) the square of the screen is even smaller.

Our bezel design is not considered perfect accuracy (smartphones can have a rounded shape, and we have covered the area on the base of the rectangle), but we confirm those that you, ymovirno, and yourself commemorated from the photograph, on the yakіy the great smartphones are shown below - in the mountain bezel, just like LG has to spend at least a month on the bezel.

As for the zahist, then in phones with large screens Gorilla Glass from Corning is victorious, while Meizu does not have a hardened glass for the zahist screen. The Galaxy S III has a Gorilla Glass 2 screen, which Corning is positioned to be 20% thinner, but not less than a lower, lower version.

While everything is intelligible, but the characteristics do not necessarily indicate a normal looking screen. For example, the Galaxy S III has a Super AMOLED screen made of wonderful black, and the axis of the RK display has three smartphones in bright black.

The tables below show the results of screen tests.

Contrast (with sleepy light)

Galaxy S III (як і очікувалося) вражає ідеальними рівнями чорного та контрастністю, адже саме контрастність при яскравому сонячному світлі страждає - навіть при не дуже яскравому світлі відбивна здатність екрану дуже низька, тому при сонячному світлі екран видно набагато більш розбірливо, ніж у інших смартфонів .

The HTC One X does not have such a deep black color, like the S III, but it still has a good contrast ratio - one of the best, as they say in RK displays (though not the best). Razbіrlіvіst in drowsy light - higher than the average, but not so good, like a Super AMOLED screen.

The screen of LG Optimus 4X HD is considered to be the most beautiful RK display, which is the most beautiful of all smartphones model range LG), і, tim schonaimshe, 750 nits - to reach the high brilliance. It's a pity that it doesn't improve the clarity in a sleepy light, but even though the screen doesn't have direct sleepy shifts, the 4X HD screen provides even better image clarity.

The screen of the Meizu MX 4-core has the most black and white screens of several smartphones, which you can see, with which wines I can not get richer, the darkest RK display in this test (One X screen). As a result, the contrast is not too high in ideal minds, but in a sleepy light it becomes worse.

More factori, yakі it’s impossible to look at the table. At the Meizu MX 4-core screen, the contrast ratio is significantly reduced, as if marveling at the new light, plus it appears to create colors.

The LG Optimus 4X HD screen maintains contrast regardless of the view, under which you marvel at the new, wanting to create colors under the song.

The HTC One X screen doesn't have any lucid problems, plus it gives you the same reception of a big balloon, if you know that the image is painted farboy on the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S III does not suffer from a decrease in contrast ratio, but under the bright colors on the screen there is a bluish color (which is more powerful for AMOLED). Vіn tezh cope with the damage of the bugatospheric image, but One X is better for the senses.

In this order, varto saw two groups of koristuvachs. The deep black and vibrant colors that the AMOLED screen is famous for are like, for them the Galaxy S III will be an ideal choice. And don’t forget about this miraculous visibility in a sleepy light.

Representatives of another camp do not want to sacrifice the brightness and quantity of pixels, they are worthy of HTC One X.

LG Optimus 4X does not stand out from its competitors, ensuring the same level of clarity and view more high rіven bright, bright, the True HD-IPS RK display looks even better, not seeming even about those that are installed on the most compact case of three smartphones with large screens, which can be packed to the top.

If you criticize this screen, then the Meizu MX 4-core screen will be the same - it doesn’t have a similar look, the image format (height-to-width) is not ideal for reviewing photos and videos, and in general, the screen parameters are not compatible with other smartphones. Tse is not a filthy screen, but the flagship one.

Battery hour

A lot of people are very worried that 4-core processors can be even more energy efficient. NVIDIA has added a CPU core - the so-called energy-saving core - to last an hour of battery life. Virobniki also tried to install smaller batteries in their smartphones. With an additional free space at the link with the great screens, we were able to reach the best success - LG Optimus 4X HD and Samsung Galaxy S III batteries with 2150mAh and 2100mAh respectively. HTC One X has a "lesser" 1800 mAh battery, no matter how large the world is, while Meizu MX 4-core has a close indicator, no matter how compact it is.

Battery capacity (mAh)

Details about the hour of operation of batteries on the skin phone were written individually in a few articles. And in this article, we are in the middle of the work of the batteries of chotyroh telephones.

Let's take a look at the given tables, which shows the vitrivality of telephones. Qi indicators mean how many hours the battery works for a song, however, for all phones, the mode of choice. We were honored with phones like this: 1 year in 3G mobile mode, 1 year Wi-Fi web browsing and 1 year SD skin video review 24 years.

Vitrivality (hour of autonomous work)

The best result was demonstrated by the Samsung Galaxy S III - 43 years old. If you test the phone not more intensively, lower the test, then drain the battery charge for two days.

Another phone with the same battery - LG Optimus 4X HD - showing the result of 40 years. Depending on how much you come home the next day with a phone call, you can also get a battery charge for two days.

The HTC One X and Meizu MX 4-core are equipped with not the same batteries, which lasted for about the second day.

Let's see, how do telephones cope with okremi tasks. The LG Optimus 4X HD can be used without interruption in mobile mode for less than 8 years, but the battery life can be resolved by three phones for approximately 10 years of mobile service.

Robot hour (in mobile mode)

The Optimus and HTC One X show off an impressive hour of non-stop browsing the web - a battery life of about 4 years. Unsurprisingly, but the Galaxy S III is revisiting this display for the whole year (phones with AMOLED screens sound more charged when you look at more important web sites, like in our test), those same Meizu MX 4-core (want to here, obviously, I won’t stop the role of playing a smaller screen).

Robot hour (review of web pages)

Samsung Galaxy S III with the great wind having become the leader for the hour of video creation - the new one has the highest performance, the lowest one has the best phone by this criteria (Optimus 4X HD).

Robot hour (video review)

Three smartphones, the last hour of work and battery demonstrate Samsung Galaxy S III, and people who spend a lot of time looking at the video on the phone, actively trade.

Next, follow the LG Optimus 4X HD - in the rest of the space for three categories (in the mode of browsing, reviewing web pages and video), and less of a hitch to the fifth energy-saving core, which allows you to economically drain the battery in the non-sharpening mode, to your smartphone in the distance I will disguise myself at the ford. We show good results with a quick win, but looking at those with the largest battery, we rated the one with the largest one.

It is often explained that the LG Optimus 4X screen is richer and brighter, lower in yoga supernics, with 50% adjusted. And tse means that you need more energy for work. However, on the right, not only in the same way, but we repeated our test for automatic brightness and took away similar results, before we need to be safe, that the screen does not light up for an hour.

The LG Optimus 4X HD and the Samsung Galaxy S III may have an added advantage: they have a battery swap so you can carry a spare battery with you so you need to spend an hour on your phone without having to charge it.

Meizu MX 4core was placed in the third place. In the review mode, video wines cannot be compared with S III, but for two other wine criteria on the same level. However, the non-economical battery life in the scaling mode reduces the overhead indicator of battery life for a few years. The results are better, lower Optimus 4X HD, while in more intensive mode, but the battery is not visible in the third place.

With the HTC One X, you can use your phone for a long time, but it's worth looking at the web pages and watching the video, your smartphone is on the middle level. It's shameful that HTC was not equipped with a bigger battery (it won't be replaced until then).

Software security and yoga features

Samsung, HTC, LG and Meizu have abandoned the world of “vanilla” Android and are creating proprietary interfaces that Ice Cream Sandwich is known for. Here, nothing was given to the will of the vipadku, and all the virobniks started the basic Android OS as much as possible, a little stink could be generated at the time of the exit of their outbuildings.

As often happens with Android, version 4.1 of Jelly Bean will be announced a couple of months after the entry into the market of flagship models. However, given the improvement of their leading positions in their lineup, I do not doubt that for these flagship models the Jelly Bean update will be available, with less nutrition in the case.

Tim is not less than that, without Jelly Bean and її Project Butter, Android miraculously shows itself on all kinds of outbuildings. And it’s not surprising, looking at the power of these smartphones.

The HTC Sense UI interface brings out the best and most natural look, just like TouchWiz on the Galaxy S III has more technical capabilities than the International Space Station.

All right "Swiss army knife" with touch screen. In fact, TouchWiz does not compromise on the basic technical capabilities of Sense UI. For example, the interface can be affected by the audio codec Apt-X, which is safe high quality stereo sound via Bluetooth, different camera modes, HDR and the ability to take photos at once for an hour of video recording. Offended stench pіdtremuyut bezdrotove z'ednannya HDMI (Samsung AllShare Cast & HTC Media Link HD).

However, we can't ignore the additional capabilities of TouchWiz, such as S Voice (a competitor to Siri from Apple), S Beam (an NFC-based media source), Pop-up play, and Buddy photo share. Even though they haven't realized their potential yet, such functions as Smart Stay and Direct call prove the fact that TouchWiz is worth it.

Let's move on to Optimus 4X HD. It appears that LG has already celebrated the great work with its Optimus UI 3.0. The Koreans added less respect for individualization and made some subtle, but scarce changes to Android. More often than not, compared to competing smartphones, here you pay more attention to the design elements of the "vanilla" Ice Cream Sandwich, and in our opinion, it's not bad.

Irrespective of the small number of changes in UI, there may be beautiful drawings, as if to make your “shkirka” special and please the koristuvach. There may be a lot of victorious labels, which will effectively help you save an hour, so you learn how to beat them.

On the other hand, Meizu MX 4-core may be the next step to Android. The interface of Flyme OS 1.0.1 is based on Ice Cream Sandwich, but it is not similar to Android. Indeed, its design and navigation are more suggestive of iOS and Apple.

At first glance, Flyme OS is a simple interface from a small computer with screens filled with icons. There are no shortcuts for the new programs, and the icons of the programs are on the main screens, like in the iPhone.

You can easily replace the TouchWiz shell from Samsung, Sense from HTC and Optimus UI from LG for better or worse, and Meizu's Flyme z-axis is not visible. Vіn sewing is deep in Android, so you can change it there in your own way, have a chance to dig on the forums, first install your own shell.

With whom, Meizu was preparing a good Lock Screen probing, a wonderful manager of the task and the center of care. Koristuvachs, like calling to Android, need three hours to call a wonderful interface, but if the stench calls, the stench will work with it without problems.

Unfortunately, the Flyme OS is the least functional among those reviewed in this test. A too simple interface between the capabilities of the core, there are fewer widgets and the necessary tools to navigate the basic capabilities of Android. However, if you look like it is similar to iOS with the freedom of Android (it’s rich in why), then it’s a miracle choice.

Zreshtoyu, choosing the shortest interface - nutrition of special likenesses. Obviously, there are differences between them, but only you can choose which one of them suits you. It is also important to understand that all the stinks are extremely good on their smartphones and you can’t tell you about the number of hours of Android that went to hell.

And now let's move on to the fact that you are most likely to find the most consistent performance parameters in Exynos Quad processors like Samsung and Tegra 3 like Nvidia.

Dynamic parameters

As always, we tested the performance parameters of the skin phone dynamics. Three phones took away the “Good” rating, and one - HTC One X - the “Average” rating, although in fact they were three times less than their competitors. The Galaxy S III and LG Optimus 4X HD have three louder speakers, while the other two models have lower speakers.

Audio quality

Two of four smartphones showed outstanding results in the first part of our audio clarity test. Samsung Galaxy S III and Meizu MX 4-core have demonstrated miraculous results, and you can be sure that the stinks of the building provide perfectly clear sound for an hour of listening at home or in the car. Meizu MX 4-core in this way is on the higher level, the top is on the higher level of density, and the Galaxy S III is on the other side of the next.

HTC One X and LG Optimus 4X HD without earphones showed average results, which do not reflect their high status. We would put HTC on the third place to the lowest (albeit still sensible) equal to the created sound and three times more richness. As far as Optimus 4X HD, we got smartphones for $100 the finest yakistyu audio, for which we will take away our uncomplaining verdict.

If you connect headphones to smartphones - the picture changes, and the Galaxy S III will appear at the first place. Meizu MX 4-core does not give such a clear sound, but I still get a better sound of high quality, why go to another place. And the insults to the attachments on the Tegra 3 processor again disappointed us, with the HTC One X, we still cut the troch, lower LG Optimus 4X HD.


LG Optimus 4X HD frequency response


Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III frequency response


HTC One X frequency response


Meizu MX 4-core frequency response

Piece standard tests

Sound like a dogma: more cores, more tension. І smartphones with 4-core processors are the best on the market today. Let's just say so, and in fact only two different microprocessors will be matched.

Samsung Galaxy S III and Meizu MX 4-core are equipped with Exynos microprocessors with a frequency of 1.4 GHz. HTC One X and LG Optimus 4X HD feature NVIDIA Tegra 3 - and 4-core processors are more efficient, with a frequency of 1.5 GHz.

If there are a hundred cores, then they all stink Cortex-A9, so they have one base (Tegra 3 has a small margin). However, their graphics processors are different: Exynos vicorist Mali-400MP, the same Tegra vicorist branded NVIDIA GeForce mobile graphics processor. It also shows that the Meizu MX 4-core has a 640 x 960 screen, the same as three other smartphones have a 720p screen (50% more pixels).

And, besides, there is a lot to lie in the software security - we bachiled telephones with the same processors, which were processed in a different way. We tried our best to put all phones in the same level of mind - all the stinks work on the rest of the version of Android 4.0 ICS, adapted by the best versions, and for an hour of the test as a browser we won Chrome , perhaps, Android itself is behind it).

CPU benchmarks

We can tell from standard tests of processors. Here there is a clear winner - Meizu MX 4-core. Winning the most for Benchmark Pi, but also winning against Linpack, as well as taking off the best scores for the CPU and RAM in AnTuTu. Vin also took off the most beautiful balls from Quadrant.

The LG Optimus 4X HD and the Galaxy S III go even faster - they showed an approximately equal high result with the Benchmark Pi, while the Galaxy S III with the leading one with the Linpack, the same Optimus 4X scored higher for the CPU and RAM in AnTuTu. Quadrant gives the Galaxy S III the edge, but with a small wind turbine.

The HTC One X is on par with the Galaxy S III for the AnTuTu rating, and it came out best on Benchmark Pi, but it did badly on Linpack, and it didn't come close to impressing us on Quadrant.

Benchmark Pi

linpack

Higher is better

AnTuTu

Higher is better

AnTuTu - CPU

Higher is better

AnTuTu-RAM

Higher is better

quadrant

Higher is better


Reference tests for graphics processors

The graphics processor Mali-400MP, which wins in the Exynos microprocessor, having shown itself to do good and adding glory to it, is the cost of the Samsung Galaxy S III.

Vіn strongly outperformed his supernikіv s їх GeForce, and you could not help overpowering Meizu MX 4-core in NenaMark 2, regardless of those who tried to win at an invisible station for a few pixels (NenaMark vrakhovu "Ridne" allowed).

Meizu MX 4-core is on the other side of the field - in the case of LG and HTC navіt in equal minds of tests in GLBenchmark 2.1, if the graphics were performed at a 720p wide screen size, regardless of the actual screen size.

HTC One X and LG Optimus 4X HD with Tegra 3 are farther to go. Three of the two smartphones in the best results demonstrated One X - NenaMark 2 had about 5 frames per second, while GLBenchmark Pro scored 16 frames per second, a small advantage in Egypt and AnTuTu outperformed Optimus.

It doesn't mean that the LG Optimus 4X HD is bad at 3D gaming - its rating means that high power games will do well at 30 fps and more, and most of them will run at 50+ fps, i, Tim is not less, wines are filled with the most popular of the flagship smartphones.

NenaMark 2

Higher is better

GLBenchmark 2.1 Pro (offscreen)

Higher is better

GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt (offscreen)

Higher is better

AnTuTu-GPU

Higher is better


Benchmarks for reviewing web pages

If I look at the web pages, then the Samsung Galaxy S is on top. Vіn win at Vellamo, and showing visible results in the HTML5Test test (solutions of three phones showed identical results). I win (troch) in SunSpider and BrowserMark tests. Galaxy S III appeared to be the most popular among FishIE Tanks, but the difference between them and 720p phones was small, and it didn’t differ much from Meizu.

Meizu MX 4-core in another place behind the results of SunSpider and BrowserMark, practically on par with the S III, best seen behind the results of FishIE Tank (I know, I also added a low dose), but still taking the lowest scores in Vellamo. The smaller screen is also the result of revisiting the MX 4-core web pages.

LG Optimus 4X HD has surpassed HTC One X and is now in third place. The new one has better JavaScript, and three times more in BrowserMark, and Vellamo and FishIE tank put it on the bottom line.

HTC One X is close to the next one, but the results of SunSpider turned out to be closer to what we sounded like in 2-core flagship models of the past fate, so Optimus got the upper hand over it in the plan to revisit web sites.

sunspider

BrowserMark

Higher is better

Vellamo

Higher is better

FishIE Tank

Higher is better

HTML5 Test

Higher is better


Podbag

Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S III є kudi pragni shodo roboti CPU. The new one has more tightness, it is less practical for any smartphone on the market, but the virobnik has a chance to “blacken”, knowing that the Meizu MX 4-core will turn over yoga, vikoristovuyuchi the power of the microprocessor. However, wine is playing without a hitch in the 3D game plan and redefining web pages.

Meizu MX 4-core demonstrates that a newcomer can not only become an absolute champion on the market, but often outdo his venerable competitors. Zagalom, Vіn not the best seen, but the team that created Meizu can be satisfied with themselves for those who stink after such famous competitors.

The LG Optimus 4X HD outperformed the One X by a marginal margin in web browsing, but still won't beat the Galaxy S III in CPU tests. The HTC One X is in a similar position - outperforming Optimus in 3D gaming, but CPU performance and web browsing are not great.

I know again, we porіvnyuєmo chotiri ourselves tight smartphone on the market, and the skin of them can easily overcome mere mortals from the world of Android. Obviously, there is a difference between smartphones, but you can be sure that you didn’t choose any of them, it will be a tighter smartphone.

Possibility of the camera

Theoretically, the cameras of all four smartphones are identical - 8 megapixels, 1080p video, one light sleeper, and the shutter button. Ale, just dig a little more, and remember the difference. Such opportunities are like the mode of serial shooting, photographing during the hour of shooting video, etc., it is possible, and not so much, but sometimes they can become in good fortune.

At the tables below, you can ask what you can ask for a leather smartphone.

We reportedly described the characteristics in an individual look at a skin smartphone, so we will go through it quickly. It is more important for us to recognize the difference between practical victories of the same and quiet possibilities on different phones.

Touch-focus allows you to focus the image on a specific object. All smartphones, okrim Optimus 4X HD, allow you to watch every hour of video recording.

LG Optimus 4X HD and Meizu MX 4-core are compensated for by the presence of the physical shutter button, it is possible to change the volume switch, but the volume switch is not handy, it cannot be pressed halfway to activate autofocus.

Burst mode allows you to take pictures quickly one by one, while Meizu MX 4 needs to take less than 5 frames, while other smartphones take pictures while the shutter button is pressed. The Samsung Galaxy S III is interleaved with a maximum of 20 frames to prevent the memory from becoming overwhelmed by the same signs. The serial capture mode has the Best photo function, if you try 8 stars and the best photo is automatically selected.

HTC One X for rent also work 20 stars, or you can rent a loan. LG Optimus 4X HD rob a serial capture with a pause of about 1 second and between signs, just like three smartphones rob a little znіmkiv in a second.

Group shot is a unique HTC One X feature for group shots. Vaughn rob 5 signs, and you can choose the most important sign for a skin person, so it will be easier for you to create a group photo, at which everyone will laugh, and we won’t blink at anyone. The special program Scalado works just as well as the Huawei Ascend P1 camera, but three phones can't call for a similar function.

We have already talked about the Best photo function, but Samsung Galaxy S III offers one more Buddy photo share function, so that you can recognize the identity of your friends and automatically recognize them.

The LG Optimus 4X HD boasts a daily Time catch shot function, so you can actually take pictures before pressing the shutter button, and if you press it, you have the ability to take 5 shots, which are approximately in the period of pressing the button. Tse increase your chances to capture the right moment.

Another visual function of 4X HD is video effects in real time - it can be funny to disguise people or create a “blue screen” effect, replacing the background with a blue screen (for example, in space).

Meizu MX 4-core does not have HDR mode, but it works in Wide Dynamic Mode, taking only one photo at a time does not support HDR (which is a combination of information about different images). The Gesture shot function allows you to capture images by simply waving your hand in front of the contactless sensor - this way you will be able to avoid the camera triplet by clicking on the shutter button (thus, hitting the virtual button on the screen when clicking the song).

Yakіst single znіmkіv

A skin camera has its own characteristics, but it is not important for them, because the camera cannot pass an image quality test.

We took some pictures on the skin phone in the same minds of light (lower you can see the pictures in the new building). We also prepared two photos with 100% dill from two crushed photographs, in order to reinforce the impression as an image. We would also like to show you our Photo Quality Comparison tool.

Samsung Galaxy S III

HTC One X

LG Optimus 4X

Meizu MX 4 core

Let's start from the first image. Samsung Galaxy S III rob the most famous signs from a selection of smartphones. The transfer of color to the whole is accurate, although the green color of the troch has been created.

HTC One X has a higher sharpness plan, but does not care about aggressive sharpness. The contrast is also transcendent, and the colors are muted.

LG Optimus 4X HD close to Galaxy S III - aggressive noise dampening caused the image to become blurred in a part of the leaf, but the transmission of colors, perhaps, is more beautiful.

Meizu MX 4-core to rob signs with a low contrast ratio, as if they look bright (lack of rich colors do not help). Tіnі good opratsоvanі, rіzkіst znіmkіv duzhe close to One X.

Let's move on to the offensive crop. The Galaxy S III is the leader in terms of sharpness, but the Optimus 4X HD and Meizu MX 4-core are even close to new. I'm less likely to see HTC One X.

Prote flagship Samsung model program in terms of color - it seems that it does not seem to be correct, humovirno, through the trend of S III to show the green channel. MX 4-core is also a program, but it is connected with a skewed color balance in the white color.

Again, the colors in the photo of the Optimus 4X HD look the best. In another place, One X (ale at the new one, as a rule, overflowing colors).

Below, the alignment was directed by looking around the skin camera. Samy great kut I'll look at HTC One X, and Meizu MX 4-core and Samsung Galaxy S III don't look too bad. The LG Optimus 4X has a better look.

The Photo Quality Compare tool demonstrates how the Samsung Galaxy S III delivers the best horizontal and vertical space on a handful of smartphones, while the LG Optimus 4X HD hits you in the back. HTC One X, regardless of those that the tool skillfully captures the increased sharpness, and Meizu MX 4-core to smash soft signs, with which the horizontal and vertical lines start to get angry early.


The following diagram demonstrates that the Galaxy S III and Optimus 4X HD are in close proximity (prote in the photographs is a slight color noise). The noise reduction algorithm is more aggressive in LG, and the lines between color rectangles are not as clear as Samsung. There is a lot of noise in the photo of HTC One X, but on the Meizu signs it’s even a low noise level, and the noise dampening doesn’t cut the grass on that road (on HTC’s view).

Firstly, the third scheme demonstrates a good balance of white with piece lighting in Samsung Galaxy S III and HTC One X, as well as photos of LG Optimus 4X HD may have a dark blue light. At tsomu vіdnoshnіnі nіgіrshe having shown himself Meizu MX 4-core іz a strong blakitny vіdtinkom.

It's wonderful, but the HTC One X photo is more detailed, the lower photo is Optimus 4X HD and the Galaxy S III photo is shown, the two leaders in the photo plan. If you don’t lie to the color, then Meizu MX 4-core is good at fighting against 4X HD.

In general, in which branch we would call the Samsung Galaxy S III the winner, it has little advantage over the LG Optimus 4X HD. HTC One X needs to sharpen the pictures a lot, and we didn’t get the result, wanting the new one to have the biggest look, and it shows itself well with the filthy lightening of the f/2.0 aperture. Meizu MX 4-core has potential, but yoga software security vymagaє thin nalashtuvannya.

Yakist video

We have seen 1080p video with smartphones on a whim, but we have the same mind and lightness. We will also look at the results as we show the Video Quality Compare tool.

The Samsung Galaxy S III video was a bit over-the-top (which led to some detail). Tim is not less, the rіven détalіzаtsії zalishivsya to dosit indestructible, and only his smartphone having plundered even аk аs аs аs detailing in the deep shadow under the forest; the color transfer is accurate (even though the trochs are spread through the peretrimanity).

On the other hand, the HTC One X and LG Optimus 4X HD have greatly reduced contrast and saturation. One X strongly promotes the color of red parasols, while 4X HD gives more accurate color transfer, but it also suffers from too aggressive harshness.

Meizu MX 4-core went far enough to get the fine details, but the transfer of colors from the bikzhovtykh vіdtіnkіv (as well as from the photo).

If you take a look at the static images of the video, then you can remember such moments that you remember the hour of the video creation.

LG Optimus 4X HD is constantly focusing, so more videos (but not all) are unsuitable for vikoristannya, so the image goes out of skin focus for three seconds, and it’s impossible to fight.

HTC One X captures video at a speed of 24 fps (for the other three smartphones that capture at speed of 30 fps). Yogo video is more frequent, lower in others through less speed.

The Meizu MX 4-core makes it easy to take a narrow look, which means you'll have to zoom in backwards if you want to fit everything into the frame (something you don't need to be able to do with three other smartphones).

Below is an illustration of the width of the look.

Well, I know, HTC will take the widest look, and LG Optimus 4X HD and Samsung Galaxy S III are here between them and Meizu.

And, come on, Samsung Galaxy S III is changing the video a little, so you might have to manually change the display window, as you know on a sunny day.

On YouTube, you can watch a few videos taken by tsimi chotirma with smartphones. Don't forget to install a 1080p video and watch the video in full screen.




Let's move on to the Video Quality Compare tool. Samsung Galaxy S III leads the way in detail. Meizu MX 4-core outperforms two competitors, which are left out, and go to another place, swipe regardless of those that remember the embossed artifacts.

HTC One X video to finish the details in one part of the frame, and over that in the other part. Remember deyakі artefacts of embossing. The same cost and LG Optimus 4X HD - lack of data transmission speed. Rіzkіst rіvnomіrna, аlе pomіtno nadmіrne zavіschennya rіvnomіrna.

Samsung Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X (with iPhone 4S wins as control)

LG Optimus 4X HD vs. Meizu MX 4-core

I, nareshti, Samsung Galaxy S III, a kind of vision in the first place, not ideal, but the best of all smart phones that have been looked at. HTC One X saves a lot of detail, with the widest possible view, and even the video is slightly improved, and the color transfer is done little. However, this video has a lot of detailing of the earth for the minds of filthy lighting.

Visnovok

The Samsung Galaxy S III, HTC One X, and LG Optimus 4X HD are the best that can be found on the phone today, which is based on Android. Next to them is an outsider's bachimo (or a flagship model of its kind), Meizu MX 4-core. We chose and analyzed the greatness of the data, on the basis of which we compared some smart smartphones. The hour has come to pick up the bags.

Samsung Galaxy S III showing its life in different aspects - screen, camera, battery life, graphics processor. In addition, the new best software is secure, and if TouchWiz uses Sense, then the last version is richer than the previous one. It may not be worthy of this modern looking or PenTile screen, but in truth there are no serious problems, and the Galaxy S III is left with, perhaps, the best smartphone on the market. It’s a pity, it’s one of the most expensive at the same time from some of the smartphones that have been looked at, so the choice for this melancholy is not as obvious as it could have been.

Whose choice is even more complicated by the fact that everything is looked at Galaxy competitors S III - also hostile smartphones. Take, for example, the HTC One X with its marvelous screen design. The camera did not make the best pictures, but the video camera showed itself to be good. Even though the operating parameters of the robotic batteries did not impress us with the heat of the fire, you will take the worst of it for your price.

Head "zbroya" LG Optimus 4X HD Garnier screen the compact case has a good camera. Plus, it's a tad cheaper, the One X has a microSD card slot and a battery replacement. On the other hand, the video camera is problematic, and it does not have the best operational parameters, which you can know from this group.

I, nareshti, "dark horse" Meizu MX 4-core can successfully compete with venerable gravels on the market. It has good performance characteristics, a three-hour battery life, and a unique function when used, which is not common among three smartphones. In some aspects, this newcomer may have some shortcomings: the screen, the design of the phone, and the camera are depleted of the best.

It may not be easy to find such a smartphone at the nearest store, if you do not live in China (there is a 4-core smartphone that is cheaper). However, beyond the borders of China, the price is already equal to One X and Optimus 4X, so the new one has no price advantage, as it is possible to judge a brand that is incomprehensible.

Obviously, є th іnshі factors, yakі treba vrakhovuvat - your special likeness sane looking, as important as they are for you, the same functions, and prices for your local market.

It is important to note which of these 4-core smartphones you did not choose, you will not be fooled about your decision. Tse not just chotiri the most beautiful outbuildings, what is on the market, ale i, ymovirno, chotiri best smartphone for the price of power. We think that it has come at once best hour for Android shakers.

15.05.2014

In a short hour from the original diva, the strained rich-nuclear mobile devices turned into an invisible part of our intensive life. The stench is productive, rich in tasks, and, more importantly, accessible. Read all the know-how about hot-core smartphones: history, achievements, particularities of choice, as well as our look at the six most worthy budget solutions.



Golovne about 4-core smartphones

The definition of "4-core smartphones" is not really correct. The number of cores is the characteristic of the entire communicator, but the one that is in the new processor. The processor is the "heart" of any smart mobile add-on. Vіn zdіysnyuє all nebhіdnі rozrahunki to vykonannya set koristuvachy zavdan.

Historical facts

  • The longest hour as the leader of the midst of pickers mobile processors was the Nvidia company. She herself developed both the first 2-core and the first 4-core mobile processor.
  • The first smartphone LG Optimus 2X with a 2-core Tegra 2 processor was released by Nvidia in 2010.
  • Already behind the scenes LG Optimus 4X HD is the first smartphone based on a 4-core Tegra 3 processor.
  • Rozrobki Taiwanese company Media Tek, one of the direct releases of chips for mobile phones and smartphones, brought the market of mobile devices to a new era. Hardwearing productive accessories have become available for more people.

Perevagi

Why are 4-core processors good? As a matter of fact, the stench of the building virishuvati tі samі zavdannya, scho and old 2-nuclear, only significantly more yakіsnіsh and shvidshe. At the moment, the stench is the best solution for improving productivity and energy efficiency.

To be sure, for multi-core processors, the clock frequency of the robot is sometimes underestimated. To fight for the price of navmisne, to minimize energy supply.

The very same chotiriyadniks grow more modern igor. Even if the lines are busy in social networks and browser sides, the processor tightness factor does not play a significant role, then in rich game add-ons, the frame rate is low and periodic drops will not allow development to a possible end. An attachment with a processor of 4 cores allows you to deal with a lot of similar problems. Well, it’s welcome, if it’s yourself operating system and the programs are launched smoothly and smoothly.



How to choose smartphone

Obviously, the presence of a choti-core processor does not yet guarantee a trouble-free operation of a smartphone. Evaluate the skin okremia in a complex way. And here everything rests on the financial possibilities of buying.

Characteristics and price will be attached to pov'yazan, so it is necessary to change the device from one price range, so that you can choose the best one.

Axis of the main indicators, on how to get respect when buying a smartphone:

  • Virobnik and the frequency of the chip.
  • The amount of operational memory.
  • Rosemary is the brightness of the screen.
  • Battery location.
  • The rigidity of the hull.
  • OS version.
  • Camera brightness.
  • Support Wi-Fi, 3G,
  • Availability of a slot for a friend's SIM card and an additional expansion slot for a MicroSD card.

Android version

Why is the version of Android important, on which one does your device work? A few reasons. First, the newest and most recent additions, created in the last two years, can simply be put into practice on the operating system "bottling" in 2010 or 2011. The only thing you need to buy a smartphone with Android 2.3 or lower is to cut the budget, or you need to win the smartphone "on the povnu". In addition, there are not too many vendors to release firmware updates for their devices with the release of new OS versions by Google. For those who have fresh Android on the smartphone you bought, they will be smarter with whatever programs and services.

Processor brewers

Slid especially resolutely choose the retailer of the chip. The axis of the most authoritative and the most important of them:

  • Nvidia. As it was guessed earlier, the company itself was the first to be among the best breeders of rich nuclear chips. Prote at the same time mass attachments on її processors are not allowed.
  • Qualcomm. Productive chips, which are vicorous in the products of the leading pickers.
  • MediaTek. Often vikoristovuyutsya at the budget decisions for the account far away afternoon competent pricing policy and good productivity.

The best budget quad-core smartphones

On this day, it is not necessary to have a lot of bugs, so that you can afford your smartphone with its features. More recently, for a device with a choti-core processor and an HD display, it was possible to pay close to 30,000 rubles at the start of sales. Now, similar characteristics are available in the second place and much cheaper - thanks to the brands, if you think not only about surpluses, but also about spares.

Budget and luxury: Fly EVO Energy 5



Samy inexpensive smartphone look at ours. The ability to consider all the advantages of a choti-core processor for the lowest price. Undoubtedly, a long-lasting battery and a majestic display will become cool bonuses.

  • Price: from 5390 rubles.
  • Screen: IPS, 5 inches wide 854 x 480 (FWVGA).
  • Battery capacity: 4000 mAh.
  • Working memory: 512 MB.
  • Cameras: 5 and 0.3 Mpx.
  • 2 SIM (1 micro + 1 micro).
  • Android 4.4.
  • WiFi, 3G.

This model has only one single minus - a modest amount of operational memory. Zvichayno, happen to get lost in the one-hour launch great number dodatkіv abo resource іgor. Ale is simply ridiculous, behind the modern worlds, the price is even less than this. Ideal for surfing the Internet, reviewing films and merry days.

Productive and affordable: Fly EVO Chic 4 Quad



All the same, about the front model, you can say about Fly Evo Chic 4, only this smartphone can have more RAM and you can boast of the elevated screen building. For lovers of the most intense mountains.

  • Price: from 5660 rubles.
  • Processor: Broadcom BCM23550, 4 cores at 1.2 GHz.
  • Battery capacity: 2100 mAh.
  • RAM: 1 GB.
  • Cameras: 8 and 2 MPix.
  • 2 SIM (1 micro + 1 micro).
  • Android 4.4.
  • WiFi, 3G.

The presence of a bad camera allows you to use a smartphone like a camera and install a video camera, if you can’t help it with a larger visual attachment.

Simple and compact: Alcatel POP 2 (4) 4045D



Good solution for quiet people who don't over-pick a large 5-inch outbuilding. Compact smartphone With a small screen, that remaining version of the OS is easily stored not only in a woman’s handbag, but in the gut. Until then, POP 2 supports LTE-4 generation of the mobile Internet.

  • Price: from 5820 rubles.
  • Screen: TFT, 4 inches, 800 x 480 (WVGA).
  • Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410, 4 cores 1.2 GHz.
  • Battery capacity: 2000 mAh
  • RAM: 1 GB.
  • Cameras: 5 and 0.3 Mpx.
  • 2 micro SIMs.
  • Android 5.0
  • WiFi, 3G.
  • GPS, LTE.

Significantly low brightness of the display is sufficient for the modest battery capacity of Alcatel POP 2.

Stylish: LG Leon

A lot of smartphones in the LG company see their own original design. Not becoming a vine and LG Leon. A nice phone for fashionistas and fashionistas with a screen of optimal size and modern OS.



  • Price: from 6700 rubles.
  • Screen: IPS, 4.5 inches widescreen 854 x 480 (FWVGA).
  • Processor: MediaTek MT6582, 4 cores 1.3 GHz.
  • Battery Capacity: 1900 mAh
  • RAM: 768 MB.
  • Cameras: 5 and 0.3 Mpx.
  • 2 micro SIMs.
  • Android 5.0
  • WiFi, 3G.

The weakest part of the model is a rather “thin” battery. It is guaranteed to be recharged every day, and if you need to actively charge the device, then it’s a few times a day.

Clever mind: Micromax AQ5001

The most expensive and the most expensive solution for our budgetary review. Get a cool smartphone, pay the price. The availability of 2 GB of operative memory is especially welcome, which is handy for one-hour work with resource-intensive programs.



  • Price: from 7890 rubles.
  • Screen: IPS, 5 inches wide 1280 x 720 (HD).
  • Processor: MediaTek MT6582M, 4 cores 1.3 GHz.
  • Battery capacity: 3000 mAh.
  • RAM: 2 GB.
  • Cameras: 8 and 2 MPix.
  • 2 SIM.
  • Android 5.0
  • WiFi, 3G.

Yakisna model without obvious shortcomings. The only way to get around in Russia Micromax AQ5001 is not so simple yet. The smartphone is sold only on the official website of the company-maker, and not at the wired online stores.

Power Guaranteed: Sony Xperia E4



There were a lot of people who called for trust in over-branded brands. The same for this category of buyers pid_yde Sony Xperia E4. So, є cheap models with the same, and navit troch better, characteristics, however Sony is a famous smartphone maker. For tse bring a troch to pay extra. For some, the biggest factor may be support for LTE, which is far from being the case for all smartphones.

  • Price: from 8050 rubles.
  • Screen: IPS, 4.7 inches widescreen 960 x 540 (qHD).
  • Processor: MediaTek MT6732, 4 cores 1.5 GHz.
  • Battery Capacity: 2300 mAh
  • RAM: 1 GB.
  • Cameras: 5 and 2 Mpx.
  • 2 micro SIMs.
  • Android 4.4.
  • WiFi, 3G.
  • GPS, LTE.

It's a pity that most of the disclaimers have a brand-providing policy that includes the presence of two slots for SIM-cards in smartphones. Cost and models that are being looked at. Buyers varto insure the moment when buying.

Budget smart phones are an ideal combination of affordable prices and serious technical capabilities. Watching a movie at FullHD quality, playing it in a dynamic game, or launching some add-ons at once is not a problem. On the market of mobile devices, why choose, we have only told about the best options for our idea. Choose and let your choice be far away!