Chip Khiz ta Den Khiz"Mislennia pasta" July 24th, 2017
Today we have a book by Chip and Dan Khiz “Pastki Mislennya. How to take a decision, about yaki you do not cheat. ” Rarely buvay, schob I'm addicted to the text of the business book. For the shortest time, I fix my ideas, for the first time, I spit out all the stories about Walmart (a lot of my readers even got one store?) And I’m far from hitting the master’s bast shoes Yoga Berry in the teeth.
But here the verse is especially special: the authors did it so kindly that one cannot believe it.
What is good? First of all, the stench analyzes in detail the deeds of important food to make a decision - How do we make a decision? What makes us work like this? - I give advice on them.
At the same time, I want to retell these principles, but then I won’t let you be satisfied when you read a book.
In another way, the authors work everything more systematically, and the systemicity is not less in the mind, and in the form - the book is well structured, for example, the skin division of the tezovo is directed її zmist, which is more appropriate for me, but the more common in the business literature is better, b.
Well, last but not least, the book has beautiful stories and examples that illustrate the thoughts of the authors (and I forgive them to instill a riddle about Walmart).
Tell yourself what to enter before the courtroom, where the prosecutor sits, showing a slide in PowerPoint. Twenty alternating diagrams to bring up the blame of the wines. Let's judge by summing up the facts of the presentation, but the prosecutor may give evidence on all the statements. Then the judge accepts decisions and accusations of judgments. Where is the process here? How does this method shock you in the courtroom, why do you consider it acceptable if you praise investment decisions?
The successor under the name of Baruch Fishhoff, professor at Carnegie Mellon University, wanting to understand better, like a fool, take decisions. That is why my colleagues conducted an interview with 105 young girls from Pittsburgh and Eugene. They asked them to report their remaining decisions in seven different areas: school, fathers, clothes, uniforms, health, pennies and free time.
In the interview, the followers talked about the deeds of the undivided decision. More of us to think about the "virishennia" as a situation, if we can choose between two or more options: do we live in Chipotle or Subway? What color shirt should I buy: dark blue, black and white? Ale decision pidlіtkіv seldom make such a structure. If Fischhoff began to classify them, then he revealed: the greatest extensions of the type of solution, so as not to avenge any alternative. Win called this model a “solution statement”. For example: "I'm going to call others."
In another, the most wide-ranging type of decision, the librarians evaluated only one option, for example: “I believe that you smoke my cigarettes with a friend” or [...] “I believe, break with my friend that.” (We call this type of solution “so chi ni”.) Tse does not choose between dekilkom options, like between Chipotle and Subway, but simply vote for or against in between one alternative.
Offenses of the category, statements about the decision and so on, become approximately 65% of the decision on the charges. In other words, if you accept a “decision”, then, more than anything, there is no real choice not to fight in anger!
(Before the speech, if we had previously spent on the follow-up of Fischhoff, then we were hostile that the suggestions did not discuss the options. But if we shared the results of the follow-up with my sister, as we grew two pidlets, її did not cheer up. - If children enter at the podlitkovy vіk, the stink of the hormones and the stench of the rocky stink of the stink of the child without the participation of the frontal part.")
Slippers are blind at choice. Stinks get stuck on requests like: “Is it me for a party?” Your mental spotlight is hanging in the evening, and it will be rated okay, but other options are not considered. More lighting can allow the spotlight to show a few options: “What am I guilty of going to the party for the whole night, or go to the movies with friends, or drink basketball, and then drop in on a kilka hvilin to the party?”
Shorter seeming, podlіtki skhilnі to the narrow framework of the first enemy of the correct decisions. The stench is less than a small wife, the light is the deputy of the spectrum of options.
Abo axis:
For a long time, the Catholic Church at the decision about the canonization (so that the name of the one who will be the names of the saints) won the name of the "devil's advocate". The devil's lawyer buv vіdomy seredinі church yak promotor fidei (zmіtsnyuvach vіri), and yogo played a role in joking that nadanny arguments against the recognition of the saints. In 1983 Pope Ivan Pavlo II sacked the whole settlement, breaking the 400-year tradition. It seems that the canonization is about 20 times older, lower on the cob of the XX century.
How many of us, accepting the decision, if we svіdomo rattled people, yakі, yakі, yоu, do not change our look?
I conclude: this is a wonderful book, as it explains how to improve the quality of the decisions we have made. Read all.
Well, I, maybe, will put other books of these authors on the list for reading.
Chip Khiz, Den Khiz
Mystery pastas. How to take a decision, about yak you do not hesitate
Chip Heath and Dan Heath
Decisive
How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work
Seen with Permission Chip Heath and Dan Heath c/o Fletcher & Company and Andrew Nurnberg Literary Agency
© Chip Heath and Dan Heath, 2013. All rights reserved.
© Translated by Russian mine, seen by Russian mine, designed. TOV "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber", 2013
All rights reserved. No part of the electronic version of the book can be created in any form or by any means, including placement in the Internet and in corporate areas, for private and public discourse without the written permission of the copyright holder.
The law firm "Vegas-Lex" is giving legal support
© Electronic version of the book prepared by Litres (www.litres.ru)
Qiu book kindly supplement:
Gnuchka svіdomіst
Carol Duek
The art of explaining
Lee LeFever
Emotional intelligence
Daniel Goleman
Dedicated to our squads Susan and Amanda: the best solution we have taken
Entry
Shannon, a clerk at a small consulting company, is getting a lot of hype that CIO Clive needs to call. By stretching the last fate of Clive did not rob an iota more than the necessary minimum. Vіn zovsіm not allow talents: prudent, vmіє vigaduvati economical solution of technical problems, but also rarely show initiative. Naygіrshe, the new bastard has stosunki with colleagues. Under the hour of collecting wines, I often criticize the ideas of others, but at times it is rather condescending.
Unfortunately, Clive's cost to cause short-term problems, even if it's better for someone else knows, how to improve the company's customer database.
What would you please? Call me what?
SO YOU CONCENTRATE for a quiet few seconds, while you were thinking, then chime in, as your thought began to take shape quickly. Most of us, oblivious to Clive's situation, seem to inform ourselves enough to give some more help. Perhaps you would have pleased Shannon to call Clive, or, on the contrary, give him another chance. Ale, better for everything, you didn’t see a good challenge.
"The miraculous aspect of mental activity is those that we rarely see ourselves in a twist," - said Daniel Kahneman, psychologist, laureate Nobel Prize according to ekonomіtsi doslіdzhennya methodіv, z kakіh dіlѕkі rіshennya vіdhodіt vіd suvorої rationality, important fоr economіstіv. Kahneman writes about the lightness in the hoary book Thinking, Fast and Slow: “The normal state of our mind can be on the verge, but you have an intuitive thought that may be everything that goes on the way.
People begin to like you and not like you long before you take enough information about them. You don’t know why yourself, you trust that you trust the unknown, without doing the right analysis, you just realize that this undertaking will invariably turn out to be successful” (1).
Kahneman vvazhaє: we hurry with the whiskers, the shards are supposed to be of great significance, accessible to the eye of information and do not give respect to those who are attached to the eyes. I formulate it like this: "Those that I'm running, that's all, that's here." Referring to Kahneman's visual metaphor, we are talking about the spotlight effect (guess how a theater spotlight concentrates our attention on what it puts into a cone of light).
A higher situation with Clive has been introduced - an example of the spotlight effect. Having taken the information - and it’s minimal: it’s not initiative, it’s nasty to mate with people, and the barefoot can do it, - we immediately began to work visnovki.
Ale, the searchlight hangs over a small flame. Behind yoga, everything is at the darkness. So it is in the situation with Clive: we do not think that the next thing would be to put a sprinkling of obvious food. For example, the deputy of the one who beat Clive, why not change yoga planter's shoes schob stink better than yogo strengths(Wine is it possible to find economical solutions)? Perhaps Clive would have been treated badly with a mentor, which would have helped him to set ambitious goals and reduce the level of claims to others?
And how can we dig deeper and raptly, that Clive's colleagues are hooting with hard and straight words (maybe it's the IT version of Dr. House)? What is it that bothers us to think that Shannon's denial about Clive proves to be valid? Raptome won a good manager? If we move the spotlight from side to side, the situation will be less illuminated. It is impossible to learn how to choose the best solution for Clive, but it is not possible to move the spotlight. Prote mi postiyno so robimo.
That is why it is important for us to take a decision: those who have been hung up by changing the spotlight, it is rarely necessary to take revenge for the right choice. Most of the time we forget to move promin. Putting your hand on your heart, sometimes you start to forget about the spotlight: we have known each other for so long in the crying flames of light that we can’t take the great landscape beyond our borders to respect.
YAKSHO VI Vivchit decision, if people accept it, then you will reveal: the range is no longer hostile.
For example, people often change their profession and misbehave about their choice. A study by the American Bar Association showed that 44% of lawyers do not recommend young people to go into law. In the study, carried out for the fate of 20,000 top managers, it was revealed that "40% of them recognize failures, shy away or go for the power of 18 months after being recognized." Over half of the readers should throw the robot through the chotiri rocks. Moreover, thanks to the tributes of the Philadelphia graduates, teachers may more often throw a job, lower students - a teacher (2).
Business solutions are often unprimed. One of the results of corporate anger that slander demonstrated that 83% of the decisions taken by the stoners of Vishcho Lanka did not lead to a rise in the stock price.
If another group of contributors asked 2207 scientists to evaluate the decisions made in their organizations, 60% said: bad decisions are accepted about as often as it is good (3).
Chip Khiz, Den Khiz
Mystery pastas. How to take a decision, about yak you do not hesitate
Chip Heath and Dan Heath
Decisive
How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work
Seen with Permission Chip Heath and Dan Heath c/o Fletcher & Company and Andrew Nurnberg Literary Agency
© Chip Heath and Dan Heath, 2013. All rights reserved.
© Translated by Russian mine, seen by Russian mine, designed. TOV "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber", 2013
All rights reserved. No part of the electronic version of the book can be created in any form or by any means, including placement in the Internet and in corporate areas, for private and public discourse without the written permission of the copyright holder.
The law firm "Vegas-Lex" is giving legal support
© Electronic version of the book prepared by Litres (www.litres.ru)
Qiu book kindly supplement:
Gnuchka svіdomіst
Carol Duek
The art of explaining
Lee LeFever
Emotional intelligence
Daniel Goleman
Dedicated to our squads Susan and Amanda: the best solution we have taken
Entry
Shannon, a clerk at a small consulting company, is getting a lot of hype that CIO Clive needs to call. By stretching the last fate of Clive did not rob an iota more than the necessary minimum. Vіn zovsіm not allow talents: prudent, vmіє vigaduvati economical solution of technical problems, but also rarely show initiative. Naygіrshe, the new bastard has stosunki with colleagues. Under the hour of collecting wines, I often criticize the ideas of others, but at times it is rather condescending.
Unfortunately, Clive's cost to cause short-term problems, even if it's better for someone else knows, how to improve the company's customer database.
What would you please? Call me what?
SO YOU CONCENTRATE for a quiet few seconds, while you were thinking, then chime in, as your thought began to take shape quickly. Most of us, oblivious to Clive's situation, seem to inform ourselves enough to give some more help. Perhaps you would have pleased Shannon to call Clive, or, on the contrary, give him another chance. Ale, better for everything, you didn’t see a good challenge.
"The miraculous aspect of psychic activity is those that we rarely see ourselves in a twisted way," said Daniel Kahneman, a psychologist, Nobel Prize winner in economics for the advancement of ways, for the help of such human decisions, to enter into suvoroist rationality, rationality. Kahneman writes about the lightness in the hoary book Thinking, Fast and Slow: “The normal state of our mind can be on the verge, but you have an intuitive thought that may be everything that goes on the way.
People begin to like you and not like you long before you take enough information about them. You don’t know why yourself, you trust that you don’t trust the unknown, otherwise, without conducting the desired analysis, you just realize that the undertaking will invariably turn out to be successful.
Kahneman vvazhaє: we hurry with the whiskers, the shards are supposed to be of great significance, accessible to the eye of information and do not give respect to those who are attached to the eyes. I formulate it like this: "Those that I'm running, that's all, that's here." Referring to Kahneman's visual metaphor, we are talking about the spotlight effect (guess how a theater spotlight concentrates our attention on what it puts into a cone of light).
A higher situation with Clive has been introduced - an example of the spotlight effect. Having taken the information - and it’s minimal: it’s not initiative, it’s nasty to mate with people, and the barefoot can do it, - we immediately began to work visnovki.
Ale, the searchlight hangs over a small flame. Behind yoga, everything is at the darkness. So it is in the situation with Clive: we do not think that the next thing would be to put a sprinkling of obvious food. For example, Clive's deputy, why not change the yard's shoes, so that the stench would better suit his strengths (why do you know economical solutions)? Perhaps Clive would have been treated badly with a mentor, which would have helped him to set ambitious goals and reduce the level of claims to others?
And how can we dig deeper and raptly, that Clive's colleagues are hooting with hard and straight words (maybe it's the IT version of Dr. House)? What is it that bothers us to think that Shannon's denial about Clive proves to be valid? Raptome won a good manager? If we move the spotlight from side to side, the situation will be less illuminated. It is impossible to learn how to choose the best solution for Clive, but it is not possible to move the spotlight. Prote mi postiyno so robimo.
I’m starting to read some books in the original, not suspecting that they have already been translated into Russian. To that “Heart of change” (as the book is called at the crossroads), I read like Switch. It was worthy of me, and I retell the tricks for readers of the blog.
Bajayuchi can know the translation as a whole and read it, as they fit my verses (MIF | Letters | Labyrinth | Literes).
This effect alone manages to discuss problems without context. The problem becomes more powerful people, if we don’t care, that the very indifference was created by the whole situation (if it’s less, it’s better for someone to give people small buckets, and not change the setting to black).
Zvuzhennya focus zor pidshtovhuy hang labels on people and ring out themselves in a negative result.
"Knowledge doesn't change anything," said Jerry. “People do not believe the words. You might as well try it yourself."
Under Jerry's curiosity, the women of Vietnam expanded the program, as they united sim's in a group of ten. The skin group was preparing the morning meal in full. Buli i short rules: shrimp are at the mercy of guilt, crabs and leaves of sweet potato, before cooking, it is necessary to keep hands with your sweetheart, you must take the fate of the process of guilt. These rules were imposed, and the inhabitants themselves came in handy from it. Jerry, having expanded healthy practices and instilled in the rural population a respectful status, without imposing his presence.
Through research, studies have shown that in fourteen villages, with Jerry's parents, 65% of the children became healthy and became young children. The children who were born after the appearance of Jerry, also ate food, splintered for the new one. The snakes were saved for a long time.
They called the videogram "Remisiya". head hero- Roxy, the nano-bot is in the silver hands. It will fly through the human body with a stream of blood and shoot the plump with green exchanges of chemotherapy. If you have to pass the gravel rіven, you will be shown short video clips with parting ways from the elder robot Smittі.
The leather rіven "Remіsії" can be passed in a year, it's less than 20 rіvnіv. The authors agreed that they had gone through the game, between equals, they were able to get new information about Smitty and seriously look forward to accepting the faces.
The organizers of the psychological experiment continued to motivate people with a stock of cards and stamps.
In one kav'yarn, for the production of a non-koshtovny drink, it was necessary to select the highest stamps. The other had ten, while the first two were already on the cards. Seeing the other kav'yarni more often took away the free drink, and looking at the first one, they threw it on the right. Why? In a different way, it was clear that the task was already reduced by 20%.
Rick of sight: 2016
Author : Den Khiz, Chip Khiz
Genre chi theme: Psychology, self-development
Vidavnitstvo: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber
ISBN: 978-5-000100-146-1
Mova Russian
Format: PDF, FB2
Yakist: Visual Layout or Text (eBook)
Interactive smist: So
Number of sides: 317
Description
Powerful people fall into the extreme. Zemfira did not think about such a marvelous plot. Sometimes we praise the decision bliskavichically - more than we are impressed with our rightness. We automatically pick up those facts that support our decision, and we don’t give respect to those that can super-chit you. We are to be led into the oman of mittiev emotions.
And the axis is even more depressed - we can be tormented by fates for months, for months, and we make an important decision, being afraid to have mercy. We walk around the stake: arguments - sumnіvi - fight - arguments against - you need to think more ...
Studies by psychologists have long shown that if we reach the point of choice, our brain becomes an incomplete tool: it is important to take lead, irrational reflection and instill intuition.
It's a pity, just knowing about these problems is not enough, so that they can be overcome. You won’t become better than a bachiti just for someone who knows about his short-sightedness?
In this book, the authors propagate a simple process from some of the short cuts, which allows the typical pastures of the mind to disappear. Having read її, you know: How close is the ring of insensitivity, if we faint one and the same solution again and again?
How to praise group solutions without intrigue?
How can the process of accepting a decision not look over the values of ability? If the right decision is made at the right moment, it may lie too deep.
Who is this book for?
For the restless and quiet, who is smarter rub from the shoulder.
Objectively for all - even though we accept important decisions not only for robots, but also for everyday life.
Chips of the book
- The book has a clearly pronounced therapeutic effect: the world of reading wants to break everything that is not wrong, moreover, with the best rank.
- The theme of accepting a decision is in no way relevant to the world today. Ale, before Pastok, I didn’t have a good memory of seeing on this topic.
- As soon as it was published, the book appeared on key bestseller lists: Amazon, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal
Screenshots for understanding
Den Hіz, Chip Khіz - The Pasta of the Mislennya. How to take a decision, about yak you do not hesitate