What revolution looks like a sovereign coup. Mustache revolution of the XXI century. How to awaken a new world

The Russian illegitimate change of power can be described in different terms.

Academician Viktor Vinogradov at the book "History of Slavs" states that in the Russian literary language the word "coup" in the significant change of power began to get used from the end of the 18th century, if it semantically approached the French word "révolution, one-way" Sovereign coup"). As writings, it was especially widely used in the Decembrists' movement, as they began to victorious coup as a new synonym for revolution. The French coup shook the rest of the powers.”

The very word "revolution" became widely used after the Great French Revolution of 1789. Wanting, for some kind of tribute, to postulate this word earlier from the Polish language (rewolucja). Zokrema, it looks like the documents of the famous diplomat of the Petrine hour, Baron Pyotr Shafirov.

The word "rebellion" came to us from the Polish bunt ("rebellion, rebellion"), yak, with its own devil, peregukuetsya with the German Bund ("union"). First of all, it starts in the Nikon chronicle of the 16th century: "Like in an old-fashioned rebellion."

Іnshim zaposit German term becoming "putsch" (Putsch), which resembles the Swiss dialect and means "strike", "strike". The word began to win after the Tsyurich putsch of 1839, if the peasants' troubles were brought to self-dissolution by the canton. However, the wide breadth of it bulged out less in the 20th century. Zokrema, the “beer coup” in Nimechchyna in 1923 went down in history and the “Serpne coup” in the SRSR in 1991.

Among those close to the meaning before the "coup" can be called stabbed, turmoil, rebellion. For the rest, the dictionary of Brockhaus - Efron designates that, wanting to “indicate the active support of the established power, made by the herd”, it is not straightened out on the її felling, but “maє on the method of the opir їy in the individual її organs in a specific concrete fall”.

Until the 19th century, the old Slovak word “sedition” was widely used, in the letters of the 13th–14th century it was written and recognized by the vocabulary of Pamvi Berindi (1627) as “destruction, the word “Maidan” added to the Russian revolution vocabulary. For the first meanings of tse turkishe for pohodzhennyam, the word means the land of the land. Prote after podіy on Maidan Nezalezhnosti near Kiev in 2004 and 2014, it is more and more often celebrated as a synonym for the “color revolution”.

Yakі buvayut coup

Under the coup, start to understand the sharp change of power in the state due to the violation of official legal norms and the threat of violent violence.

In high society, before the coups, one can see the undermining of the power, which was reduced by a group of osіb to the middle of the ruling elites. For example, during the hours of the monarchy, there were wider palace upheavals, near which the monarch was thrown off. Period Russian history The 18th century between the death of Peter I and the descent to the throne of Catherine II brought us to history as the "epoch of palace coups". The party coup d'état, connected with reshuffles in the middle of the ruling party leadership, can be called their worst analogue. In the 20th century of the largest expansion, there were military upheavals, at the door of those to the vlady krai, a group of military servicemen came, calling for a high rank. The regime established by them is called the military dictatorship. The other half of the century was especially rich in military upheavals, most importantly in the lands of Africa and Latin America.

More broad clouding includes also revolutionary upheavals, among such ignited people's masses. The stench often ends with a change of political order.

In the same category, they see the titles of self-coup (self-coup), under which one understands the usurpation of one power (sound vikonavcho) of all the renewal of the country. Sometimes, as an example of such a coup, to direct the dispersal of President Boris Yeltsin for the sake of 1993 rock.

For the rest of the hour, different hybrid forms of coups are blamed. For example, the military, like they knocked down the ruler, transfer the power of the opposition to other representatives of the dignified power, or the military explain their actions to the parliament and the Supreme Court.

The specifics of the 21st century were the “colorful revolutions” in the post-traditional space, that “Arab spring” on the Nearest Descent and Pivnichniy Africa, after which, in the midst of popular protests, opposition came to power. Most often, before the coups, the change of power in the aftermath of the military invasion of foreign forces is not seen (for example, the operations of the international coalition in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 2000s).

Revolutionary tendencies

Behind the ratings "Kommersant", s on the cob XXI the capital of the state leaders 38 times it was stricken in the face of illegitimate rule and not a legitimate path.

For the remaining 45 years, the world has had two hundred coups and revolutions. While in 1970-1984 it was in the middle for six-seven per river, in 1985-1999 it was for chotiri, and in the beginning of 2000 it was for the middle one for two per river. Among the unstable regions of the world, Africa is the most significant leader for the day in the Sahara, half of all similar incidents fell on the yak. Revolutionary activity in Latin America was high equal to the 1970s - the beginning of the 1980s, but then it started to rise. The third place of Asia is rich in why, having secured Thailand, which took us to the top 5 countries, de coups were most likely to traipse. behind summer period From the beginning of the 1930s, it was 19. In addition, the remaining decades were considered to be expansions of geography for the account of inclusion up to the transition of Oceania and the edge of the kolishny SRSR.

As it turned out, the vicious rapist's change of power played the role of the Viysks. Why, in the coups of the remaining decades, there are still more tendencies. Not alone vipadki, if the leaders, as if they came to power as a result of the coup, they themselves repeat the share of their successors. This is especially common in the climes of Africa. Likewise, vipadias are trapping, if the leaders, who have seized power, left and later turned around in the power of a democratic path. For example, Olusegun Obasanjo, who ruled Nigeria in the 1970s as a military dictator, ran in the legal elections of 1999. In 2006, Daniel Ortega, the leader of the "Sandine Front of the National Liberation", turned to power in Nicaragua.

On the riches thrown off the leaders in the fatherland, the checks are criminally retried. Viroks can be suvorimi, right up to mortal curry. The butt of Egypt is noteworthy, that there at once a ship will go and look at the fallen hour of the “Arab Spring” of Hosni Mubarak and his successor Mohammed Mursi. On the other hand, judges on such rights are most often judged in absentia, for the figurants knew the backdoor behind the cordon. As practice shows, for most of the overthrown rulers, the decision to deprive the country of the country after the fall was not taken by the other side.

And from chinny chapters kraїn їhati for the cordon is next to the yakomog, to that which the putschists can fawn over in their day. This pardon was paid to the ruler of Mauritania, Ould Tayye, who went to the funeral Saudi king, the head of the Central African Republic, Ange-Felix Patasse, who attended the summit of the African powers, and the Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who took the fate of the UN General Assembly near New York. Wanting to know the rest of the day, make sure: low ZMI told that the prime minister, knowing about the coup, that he was getting ready, and destroying the tour with 114 suitcases on board the litak.

Punished

Vіyskovі often play the vital role of change of power in a non-constitutional way. Since the 1970s, the stinks have gone crazy, or they have taken the fate of over 70% of all coups.

Most of the putschists are the most of the Viyskovs. Zokrema, 45 generals have spent up to our rating. Field Marshal Tanom Kittikachon, who had established the same military rule in Thailand in 1971, was the first among the ranks of the ranks.

Before similar adventures, so are the skills of the military servicemen of the middle and young command stock. You can guess, for example, Muammar Gaddafi, a kind of military coup in Libya at the rank of captain, after which he was promoted to colonel and took the rank until the end of his life. Abo Colonel Jean-Bedel Bokassa, who stole power in the Central African Republic and unapologetically voted himself emperor. The “black colonel” juntas organized coups in Greece in the 1960s and in Cyprus in the 1970s.

For Mayzhe pіvstolittya, the world had two coups, organized by sergeants. In the 1980s, a group of 16 military men with Desi Bouters seized power in Suriname. Tsі podії went up to the іstorії yak "zmova of sergeants". At the same time, Master Sergeant (Master Sergeant) Samuel Doe, having seized power in Liberia after a crooked coup, at the hour of which President William Tolbert was driven in, and members of the order were removed. Vtіm, the sergeant of the zmovnik was left unhappily - having choked the Rada of the people's order, having done it for himself by the generals.

Authors-managers of the order: Ganna Tokareva, Olga Shkurenko, Maxim Kovalsky
Photo: Reuters, AP, Kommersant, Zuma
Design and layout: Oleksiy Dubinin, Anton Zhukov, Oleksiy Shabrov, Korney Krongauz
Graduation editor: Kirilo Urban, Artem Galustyan

Sovereign coup, in the constitutional right of the violent and the destruction of the constitution, the fall of the change of the constitutional (sovereign) mode, the slaughter state power. Like a coup d'etat with the participation of the army, it is called a military coup. Under the coup d’état of the sovereignty, the rapt illegitimate change of order, established by an organized group for the adoption of legal power, is to be decided. A coup d'état in the form of a revolution is considered to be those that the revolution occurs as a result of protests against a significant group of the population, and lead to a radical change in the political regime.

The term "sovereign coup" (coup d'Etat) was first used by Gabriel Naudet (the librarian of Cardinal Richelieu) in his practice "Political interpretation of a coup d'état" (1639). Describing the scenes of St. Bartholomew's Night (1572), he proved the right of the ruler to resort to violence. In Russian history, the period from 1725 to 1762 is called the “epoch of palace coups”. With the rest of the coup d'état, it is possible to take into account the fact that on February 11, 1801, Emperor Paul I Petrovich, unpopular in the middle class of the nobility, was guards officers, who was called to the vlady of Alexander I Pavlovich

At the New Hour, the fall of Napoleon Bonaparte from the Rule of the Directory on 18 Brumaire in 1799 is respected by the classic sign of a sovereign coup. Change the constitutions and the political structure of Bonaparte, having saved the old republican legal forms, having set them up, having established, with a sanction, the regime of monarchical rule. The term “sounding sovereign coup” means that an illegitimate change of power is not suddenly, but behind a plan stretched by the hour as a result of rich political combinations. If you reach the meta legitimation of power, as if you would refrain from calling in usurpation, that is, the arrogance of the constitutional mode.

In the 20th century, the theory of "power coup" became part of the revolutionary strategy of the followers of Marxism-Leninism. Porivnyalno-historical follow-up of the sovereign coup d'état by the Italian Curzio Malaparte at the book "Technique of the sovereign coup" (1931). Vin arguing that the infrastructure of the mass society in the minds of the social crisis has a well-organized bureaucratic structure. sovereign government I will ask the authorities to bury the political minority for a nice victory in a special technology coup.
Instability political regimes I was amazed by the number of successful and unsuccessful samples of coups d'etat in the "banana republics" - small, economically weakly developed powers of Latin America and Africa. The coup d'état is a sign of instability, distortions in the internal development of society, evidence of the weakness of democratic institutions, the indestructibility of the community society, an inadequate mechanism for transferring power to the lawful way. Navit in the distance the coup d'état is threatening with dovgostrokovym negative repercussions, with a piece test, overtake or uplift the evolutionary development of the country, which often leads to human casualties and reprisals, as well as a boycott from the side of light sleepy.

The fall of the leaves in 2017 will have a hundred fates, as in Russia there was a fall, as they began to call it a yellow revolution. Dehto stverzhuє, scho tse bov sovereign coup. Discussions from the first drive are continued and dossi. Tsya statya can help to solve problems.

Like a coup

Vіk minuliy buv riches on the pії, yakі vіdbuvalis in some weakly separated lands and were called coups. The stench of a small place is important in African and Latin American countries. At whom the main state organs were choked with forceful way. Chinni kerіvniki power vіd vlady sunk. Їх could be used physically or arrested. Dehto having caught up in emigration. The change of vlady was swift.

Peredbacheni for which legal procedures were not allowed. Potim new self-appointment kerіvnik state turned to the people from the roses'explaining the lofty goals of the coup. For a short period of time, a change was made in the ceremonies of state bodies. Life in the country was troubling, but already with new її kerіvnitstvom. Like a revolution, do not create anything new. What is the essence - at the side of the vlady, the power is quiet, who is endowed with it, for the immutability of the institutions themselves. Such were the numerical palace coups in the monarchies, the main tools of such boules were the movement of a very large number of osib.

Quite often coups were called for by the fate of the enemy forces and law enforcement agencies. The stench was called military, as if the change of power led the army, which acted as a destructive force of change. With this, the clerks could be the deacons of high settlements, supported by a small part of the Viysks. Similar coups took away the name of the coups, and the officers, yak, took over the power of the junta. Call the junta to establish a military dictatorship regime. Sometime the khunti denies the functions of kerivnitsva with arrogant forces, and those members occupy key positions in the state.

Acts of coup d'etat led to a cardinal change in the socio-economic structure of the country and, due to their scale, were filled with a revolutionary character. Podії, scho vydbulisya in the past century, in deyakih powers, yakі called coups, can mother their specialness. So, for participation in them, political parties and public organizations can get involved. And the coup itself can be itself a usurpation of the power of the wikonavchy glkoy, as if sorting out all the power of the new, zocrema and representative bodies.

Many political scientists are aware that successful state coups are the prerogative of economically independent and politically independent lands. Why spray high rіven centralization of power management

How to awaken a new world

Sometimes the suspense is changed in the situation, if it is necessary to develop a new root change in a new one and break it with this camp, as it is. The smut here is a yakіsny streak, which allows you to secure progress. Talk about fundamental changes, and not about those that change only political positions. Such radical changes, which start the root bases of the state and the empire, are usually called a revolution.

Revolutions can lead to a change in one structure of the economy and social life in others. So, as a result of bourgeois revolutions, the feudal way of life changed to capitalist. The socialist revolutions changed the capitalistic devices to the socialist ones. National-vibrant revolutions swayed the peoples in the colonial staleness and adopted the creation of the independent peoples. national powers. Political revolutions are allowed to move from totalitarian and authoritarian political regimes to democratic ones. It is characteristic that revolutions are formed in the minds, if the legal system is thrown off without supporting the revolutionary changes.

Vcheni, scho doslіdzhuyut revolutionary processes, slander on the number of reasons for the emergence of revolutions.

  • Part of the righting slabs are repaired, so that the stone worker of the state and її honed may have a significantly greater increase in that ability, lower representatives of other elite groups. As a result, dissatisfaction can stimulate the suspense and yoga to fight against the regime.
  • Through a change in the state budget, the order of the power of that elite is forced to pay. The pennies of bureaucracy and military officials are being reduced. On this basis, the dissatisfaction is blamed on the speeches of these categories of workers of the state.
  • Growing up people's bewilderment, as if encouraged by the elites, and as a rule they call out to social injustice. Tse naslіdok spend the camp at the sspіlstvі. People's discontent grows into stabbing.
  • An ideology is being formed that reflects the mood of all versions of the society. Not sleazy, in the form of won, people are driven to fight against injustice and injustice. Vaughn is the ideological basis for consolidating and mobilizing the people who oppose the regime.
  • International support, if foreign powers are guided by the support of the ruling elite, and start cooperation with oppositionists.

Who has authority

  1. The coup in the state - the power of replacing yoga, which was carried out by a group of osib, yakі organized the movement of the opposite.
  2. The revolution is an arduous bahatoplanovym process of radical changes in the society. In the wake of this, the current suspіlny device collapses and new ones are born.
  3. The organizers of the coup to put downed the ker_vniki of the state as a metaphor, as if it were shvidko. Sound the coup, don't miss the essence of the people's support. The revolution transfers to a greater extent the change of the orderly system of management and the social harmony. The revolutionary process will take place for a long time, with progressive growth of protest moods and expansion of the participation of the masses. It is not uncommon for a very political party to be very strong, for it is not possible to gain control of the legal way. Tse often ends in bloodshed and that huge war.
  4. No ideology sounds like a coup, which is what yoga participants are looking for. The revolution is taking place under the influence of class ideology, which changes the identity of a significant part of the people.

zahoplennya state power, zdijsne illegal, "unconstitutional", zasobami that (on the vіdmіnu vіd revії chi insurrection) by the forces of a small group of people.

Vіdmіnne vyznachennya

Not exactly appointed ↓

POWER REVOLUTION

(coup d'tat) Raptove, rapist and illegally put into the order, viroblene sound viyskovymi; quite often it is overwhelmed by trival mass zavorushennya, and a direct drive against the enemy. The most common way to bring about a coup is to replace one ruling group of others. WHO MOZHENTION PRINT CROCH TO ONDІєSO Forms of Rellennnya VIYSKOVYY - Z Bіlshuyu Chi Mehlyu Plot Tsivіlny Osіb (cannochnaya, school, Spekіvpratsi, Schinnikіv, Spetsіstіv Ta Represents Serious Claus, Spіvichulyuchi Polіtikіv, part_ykuchuyi group, says, Selianskiy ). In the case of a sovereign coup in the center of respect, there is the adoption of the leaders of the military battles, so do not call the blame for large-scale changes in the suspension system. Most of all, a coup d'état seems to be effective zasib the advancement of revolutionary changes "from below" at the sight of such transformations "burn out". Prote vtruchannya viyskovyh rarely priyaє virishennya social and economic problems that have accumulated. It would be wrong to say that there are no state coups in the industrialized countries, the protesters rarely scatter there, indiscriminately due to their popularity, on a legitimate basis and widely practiced regularly and organized change of administration. Evropi Vipruda Vitskoy Vtudachanum Buli Sprovokovі Abo Nevtychi Polіtiki Decolonіzazії (Franzіia at 1958 r. Ta Portuguene in 1974 r.), Aboy Polarizatsyyu (GOLTІYA at 1967), Aboy (8) Skіdnіy єvropі (8) ). The strength of the European Union, the non-mandatory mental membership of which is democracy, is also accepted as a stabilizing official. More than that, here at the order of the military and constitutional ones, they have their own corporate and professional interests. However, in the countries that are developing, and in the weakly developed countries, the introduction of the military to the politician was a prominent phenomenon right up to the 1980s. n. The nature and frequency of state coups lie in the form of powers and specific minds. Latin America is the most "wealthy", starting from the birth of republics; dosvіd vtruchannya vіyskovyh at the politician; the stench thrashed about in such porvennih lands, like Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. In the African lands, they took away independence, because of the existence of a system of free and regular elections, and in the minds, if they are equipped with a significant world of personification, they can encircle power and practically do not have a legal basis, state coups have become a broadening of the economy. I use a sprinkling of different, ale po'yazanih theoretical scales, which deal with the relevant nature and causes of sovereign coups. Some of them try to explain them by huge upheavals, economic downfall, political and institutional failures. Vidpovidno to the point of dawn, vtruchanna vіyskovykh in politics pove'azane z їhnoyu reaction to strong social and political developments in the mix with a low or minimal level of political culture. Vіyskovі deyut mayzhe "in absentia", filling the vacuum of the central government. Other scholars joke about the explanations of the military affairs of the politician to the organization of the army’s advances (discipline, centralized command structure, grouping) in line with the public institutions of weakly developed lands. On my mind, vtruchannya in politics, better for everything, born of deep disappointment in civil ceramics, exclaiming yoga incompetence and corruption. Deyakі give respect to us in front of domestic policy military forces, attacking the fact that the coup, inspired by special ambitions, corporate interests, supernumerary choices and often turbulent manifestations of ethnicity and group identity, greater or lesser world and vipadkovymi. At that very hour of the vindication of Latin America in the 1960s–80s. authoritarian military regimes are attributed to the recent model economic development, based on the idea of ​​replacing imported goods with commodities and the need to invest in large foreign capital investments in the establishment of an economy based on exports. Vіyskovі w bli spovnenі rіshuchostі zalishatisya under vladі for rozbudovi suspіlstva that dvorennya friendly minds for foreign investors Summingly, the analysis of foldings and the minimal phenomenon can be explained by one or more changing factors. At times, the very military regimes of the daedal were more turbulent, like five scenes; how to step aside in the management, not calling for a new coup. From the 1980s. The situation became even more pronounced due to the Borg crisis, and the powers-creditors were able to strengthen the effective management. International monetary organizations also began to help create a wealthy party democracy, as if to wash away a little extra help. As a last resort, the number of samples of military coups drastically changed in the lands of the Third World (Third World). Particularly commemorate this trend in Latin America, and in other regions of Vienna, ceramics continue to repair the opir vimog vladati power. And from, for example, at Ganya, the Viysks were in time for the elections, and they stumbled again under the rule.

Suddenly I got stuck again with the character, who categorically moves "putinslіl", "traveler", "to piss off new Russia" just mantry. Virishiv rozіbratisya, scho ruhaє such characters. At the go, ahem, “remove” (from my side, there was a big єkhidnі, I repent, nurture, from the new one - streams of ungodly matіv upermіzh іz threats to my address) it was clear that the character was a “monarchist” and an accomplice of the “Russian revolution”.

I didn’t become aware of what the “Russian revolution” is (everyone clearly understood there - “beat the Jews, hachiv those others” and other racist-Nazi madness), but got angry at the “monarchism”. And after sleeping, whom to blame for the role of the king. I had a tearful roar about those, how the Bolsheviks beat Mykola the Other. I slept again: who will be the king if you win the “Russian revolution”. They sent me a portrait of Mykoli the Other. Then I specified that the character is going to clone the king and put him on the throne right in front of the relics. After that, from the side of the yogo, there was hysteria and the character vtik skarzhitisya uncles-myslivtsev, who has a ruzhzho. A monarchist without a monarch is more zhalyugidna, a lower European integrator without Europe.

All of this "in the countryside and zmistovna" Rozmova gave me the idea to write about those that I did not support the Kiev Maidan.

Otzhe, Sheet of a professional revolutionary maydanutim(not only Ukrainian, but Russian, moreover, the other character was Russian itself).

I have been a professional revolutionary for ten years. I spend half an hour on those who want to learn how to properly throw off the order. After re-reading the available (and inaccessible, zokrema z spetskhraniv) books on the theory of sovereign coup. Having seen the practice of the classics of coups, the successful completion of different lands that century, seeing the reasons for the success of some of the failures of others, to create the methodology of a sovereign coup.

Mіy did kav: “If you are robish, then work well. If you can’t do good, don’t work hard.” That's why I vperto vchivsya, how right it is to turn over like a kіsno. I victorious with my assistants Auguste Blanca, Leon Trotsky, Volodymyr Lenin, Curzio Malaparte, Edward Luttwak, Carlos Marigelli, Ernesto Guevary and many others. Vivchav notes of fellows, report descriptions come on, help the participants and create artistic creations dedicated to the revolutions.

On the basis of this, I formulated two clear statements: about those who need to be robed, and how they definitely don’t need to be robbed. On the old "Khvili" there was a series of my articles dedicated to chom.

Just briefly, for a successful revolution you need:

1. Pokrokovі program of reforms in the skin galusi.

2. Personnel reserve of revolutionary managers, yakі zdіysnyuvatimut tsі reforms.

3. Analysis of possible threats and negative reactions from the side of external gravity and reporting plans for neutralizing these threats to reach the status quo from external forces.

4. Revolutionary mind - clearly according to Lenin's diduse, nothing better for the new one without formulating the dos. Usі qі "the top can't, the bottom don't want to" and so on.

As long as you don’t have all the warehouses, you can’t start. To that in such a time it is crooked, zhorstoko, mediocre and stupid. Yak at the Kiev Khunti.

If you don’t have a plan for a coup, then a lot of people will die in your course. Before the hour of the Zhovtnevy coup in Petersburg, only six people perished. Six! And then tse buli yakіs ekstsesi, if in someone from the guardians of the Timchas order they put nerves and wines, having begun firing, they would shoot him with zmusheni.

If you don’t have an ideology, if the whole country is ready to accept it, you reject the mass war. What happened in Ukraine, where one region is close to Russia, two are fighting for those who want to work for themselves, and another thing is actually in the minds of the internal occupation (like Odessa, in the same way there were thousands of armored vehicles and armored vehicles).

If you don’t have a clear program of reforms, then you’ll have a lot of ideas about reforms, but if you don’t have real changes every day (hiba scho in the biggest book).

If you don’t have a personnel reserve, then you will happen to get different passages in Georgia or the Baltic states, if you don’t rob anything, steal pennies from their sight and flow.

More than that: if you don’t have a clear positive program, if your followers support your team, your team will break up into conflicting groups, as if they will be more busy with war one by one, lower by the state of power.

I will show on the butt of the quiet same bіshovikіv, like the best vvchenih in our historiography. The Bolsheviks were preparing for the revolution 12 years, from the moment the rebellion was strangled in 1905. And under the circumstances, in 1917, Lenin wrote that, better for everything, there will be no revolution in Russia for this life. Tobto, the stinks were going to cook її yet again.

The Zhovtnev revolution for the Bolsheviks was right-winged. It’s just that the liberals from the Timoshovy order, after the lute coup, the floorings were quickly raved about all the galleys and spheres of the economy and the sovereignty of Russia, which the checks did mean the residual rozval of the countryside and її vengeance by the western empires.

For example, for the sake of his rule, Kerensky's ranks won the imperial borg of Russia from 38 billion rubles in gold to 77 billion, that may be twice!

Until then, the Timchasovy order (liberals-zahіdniki, why are they chekat!) having continued Witte's line of selling Russian industry and infrastructure to foreign capital. Zvichayno, in the minds of war and instability, he fought for pennies. Guess no one? This is the one in Kiev, Arseniy Petrovich is called.

Add to the number of military defeats on the fronts, mass desertion (the number of deserters for some kind of dzherel outweighed a million people), a real threat hunger.

For the sake of his rule, the Timchasovy order (as it is fashionable to say “kamikadze order” at the same time) achieved what everyone hated him: monarchists, socialists, soldiers on the fronts, workers in factories, and villagers in a deep body.

Who is in charge of prodrozki? Liberal-Democrats-Rynochniks in 1916 worked under the “Tsar-Father”! The Bolsheviks, for the first time, replaced її with a "feedback" for the first time.

Regardless of all the hardships, the Bolsheviks were ready to launch a coup d'état an order of magnitude better than today's forces in Russia and Ukraine.

Stink mali mayzhe vіsіm thousand Marxists. And a literate Marxist (not a human being, as he simply calls himself such, but read, studied and mastered the practices of Marx and other economists) is already a ready-made economist-manager (finished by practice). A lot of them also passed through military service one or the other was trained at the military academies. So stink of a small personnel reserve.

They had ready programs of reforms, they had additional commissions of Vernadsky, they had programs for the liquidation of illiteracy and industrialization, the project of land reform was taken to the Eseriv. Also, the stench was not dogmatist-fanatic and promptly acted on what did not work (for example, Soviet communism), but they tried something new, something that did not fit into the ideology, but really practiced (NEP).

The coup d'état was created so jubilantly that "the lieutenants of the 26th day of the 26th, officers with pannoks under the handle walked along the embankment, not suspecting that the government had already changed." Align two months of mediocre and crooked standing on Hrushevsky near Kiev.

I, no matter what, all the same bula Gromadyanskaya war, were numerically foreign military interventions, and the traces were similar to those of the Great Vytchiznyanoi war look like different Belarusian saboteurs and Vlasivtsiv, like they served the Third Reich.

Perfectly comprehensible are the possible reminiscences (and richly ahead of them in publications, and in special stories from various “community activists”), I called out to prepare a revolution in Ukraine, but I was the enemy to carry it out. Especially under the gasls of "evrokhalyavi" and "Muscovites on knives". It is important to show more guide to my looks, lower euromaidan. I want to open up the world like in Japan (there at the same time 74% of the population is with a holy light, i tse number is more than enough), u close hundreds of VNZ. I want to promote good people, to freeze pensions and wages. I want a new industry, so that I can achieve the necessary viability. I want the nationalization of the privatized (don't let it get soft, through redemption), to sell the excesses of statehood. I want subjectivity for Ukraine; I have always been aware that the Ukrainians can only take care of themselves, I believed in "a cordon will help us." I realized that it is necessary to be friends with Russia in a language-wise way - tse and replicate the legacy of ancestors, and economically wisely hated "Muscovites". Vzagali waiting points dotik.

Paired with Yatsenyuk, Kolomoisky and Tymoshenko navit Yanukovych buv "ice". So, just like you can criticize Putin for a long time, ale, equal with Khodorkovsky, Navalny, Kasyanov and Katz, wine is just a gift from heaven.

Shchoraz, if you want to shout "It's time to throw Plotnitsky in the LNR!" And the sound is quiet. Garazd, I know a little bit of mystsevs there, I could call for a sprinkling of candidates, but I didn’t know anything, but I could shout! More than that, I care that Luhansk citizens can no longer decide who should be the leader in them. But I didn’t hear such calls from Luhansk citizens. Must stink go stars from sofas deep in Russia! Give Lyapkin-Tyapkin here! Give everything and once, and with a great spoon!

Shchoraz, if you want to shout "It's time to throw off Putin", I feed "Who is the natomist?". It’s more practical than food, so that you don’t change the awl for cuteness and don’t take the cat into a bear. And at the vіdpovіd - that silence itself. Abo show such nasty peaks that you spit on the water. And the leaders of these processes are encouraged to better hovatisya in the shadows, showing in the world only clowns like Navalny from the liberal side, Kurginyan - from the pseudo-leftist Nesmyan - from the "patriotic".

Yaskravy butt - a whole russophobe pan Prosvirnin, who wrote earlier that 95% of the inhabitants of Russia hate wine “for beadle” and that they need to be protected, then we fiercely hit the Maidan near Kiev and raptom sharply became supportive of Novorosiya. It’s too deep to spit, some kind of ideology to pretend to reach your goals and to win as a result for the collapse of the constitutional harmony in Russia.

And the option “we’ll throw it off, then we’ll marvel” to go straight to the garden. In Kiev, they already “looked”: the villainous oligarch came to the vlady zamіst, crooked, dishonorable bastards came.

What, were there objective reasons for Yanukovych's removal? For the sake of what varto was it to drown the blood of the whole region? Famine at the edge of the buv? The hryvnia exchange rate has fallen? Default coming? Wages not indexed? Tariffs have increased for a few times? Skasovuvali human rights? Ah, no, it all happened after the fall, the zavdyaks of the new “combed and democratic rule.”

Tim is bigger, it's absurd in Russia. What are the objective reasons for Putin's toppling? Is the economy falling apart? No, do not fall apart. Is the new language growing? No, hurry up. Perhaps, the fallowness in the Sunset is growing? No, fall. Why Russia does not have a sovereign position in the current politics? I think that Washington is in permanent hysteria.

Maybe Novorosiya has fallen? No, stop, renovate, renovate the road with a triplets to plant (actually half of Donetsk is near apartments, beauty!). Why do you think that the chaos and the mass war in Russia will help Novorossia? And without some kind of constitutional collapse, I’ll arrange no way out. Vono komus, krim crooked maniakovy negidnikiv, need?

For 15 years, the Russians will do well 4 times. Such is the need to appreciate. Chi zabuli vi, scho bulo in the nineties? Oh, so, the schoolboy, even the only one at the project, is stunned! Now, the "evil and liar" Putin, having developed the economy, inspired the army and respected the plans of the "partners"? Why would you like a "traveler" you can not tell.

As I already said, I am a technocrat. I don’t care if I don’t care about the obviousness of the working methodology.

Why are the Kiev maydanuts reform programs? There is no dosi and there will not be. Chi molded the stench of the personnel reserve? If I showed them what it was necessary to work, the stench looked “not before we were busy throwing Molotov cocktails to the police.” Chi thought stinks, how do other countries react to an evil coup? Stink this hour or American liver. What did the stench think, how do millions of Russians react to the "Muscovites on knives", how do they live in Ukraine? The stinks galloped, they were having fun.

What Russian "anti-Putins" are pursuing a program of reforms? Everything that I'm still bachiv - tse zhalugidna similarity, without daily samples of detail. Do they have a personnel managerial and technological reserve? There is no way to stress. Why think about the stench of the consequences that the United States and other lands are working for a coup? Not a second.

You are not revolutionaries, gentlemen maydanuti all the tickets, you mediocre raguli.

Alexander Rogers